Here's some similarities to choose from:
- Both have three branches and a separation of powers
- Both governments share powers with each other (concurrent powers). Some shared powers are the permission to collect taxes and build roads.
<span>In January 1830, in a dramatic encounter on the floor of the United States Senate, the debate over the nature of the Union took an alarming turn. The debate moved beyond the exchange of alternative views on how to administer the federal government to accusations and recriminations about the destruction of the federal government and the Union. States’ rights and nationalist positions, which previously were adopted without regard to a consistent pattern of sectional identification or alignment, were defined in a way that portended political violence between irreconcilably opposed sections. The event that presented this portent of sectional discord was the debate over the nature of the Union between Daniel Webster of Massachusetts and Robert Y. Hayne of South Carolina.</span>
Answer:
Reactive
Explanation:
A proactive approach is one that tries to anticipate problems or conflict. In other words, it tries to preempt events and even prevent them from happening. On the other hand, a reactive approach is one that "reacts" to a problem. This approach requires a problem or event to take place before any action is taken.
