Answer:
Shoe-leather costs.
Explanation:
Resources wasted when inflation encourages Bob to reduce his money holding for more than 2 weeks incase it does decrease.
Answer:
a) rise; fewer
Explanation:
In the case when the market is more optimistic so the price of the share would be increased that results in the issuance of the few shares to raise the funds that are required keeping all other constant.
Therefore in the given situation, the option a is correct
Hence, the same is to be considered
Thus, all the other options are incorrect
<span>The licence privilege of any driver who is stopped by a law enforcement officer and found to have a breath or blood alcohol level of .08 or higher will, at the time of arrest, will be suspended.
If the driver is under 21 and </span><span>have a breath or blood alcohol level of .02 or higher will, at the time of arrest will have the driving privilege suspended for a period of 6 months.</span>
When you purchase the exact same office supplies you purchased in the previous quarter, you are making a straight rebuy.
<h3>What is a straight rebuy?</h3>
This is the type of purchase that a customer is known to buy that is in the same quantity and the same terms as the goods from the same supplier.
The perfect example of this is that people are known to visit the same coffee shop daily to make the same purchase.
Read more on a straight rebuy here:
brainly.com/question/8530057
#SPJ1
Answer:
Instructions are below.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
First investment:
5 deposits for 5 years at an interest rate of 10%.
Second investment:
Lump-sum for 25 years at an interest rate of 8%.
We weren't provided with the value of the deposits, but I can provide the formulas and an example.
<u>First investment:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit= $2,000
FV= {2,000*[(1.10^5)-1]} / 0.10
FV= $12,210.2
<u>Second investment:</u>
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
FV= 12,210.2*(1.08^25)
FV= $83,621.25
