Answer:
a) rationalization
Explanation:
Rationalization refers to a process in which controversial behaviors (e.g, a bad behavior) are explained in a justified manner even when that is not the case.
An example of rationalization is a person who openly lashed out to another person and then later on explaining that it was as a result of the bad stress he passed through earlier in the day.
Answer:
different plants grow in different climates so when humans don't interfere then the only thing that will grow is that which grows well in that climate.
Explanation:
Every style can be chosen as per the comfort of the person. Finding a solution that will entirely satisfy all parties involved is part of collaborating. As you might say, a win-win scenario.
About win-win scenario
A win-win game, also known as a win-win scenario, is a unique case of the non-zero-sum game which results in a result that benefits two or more participants equally. A lose-lose scenario results by default if a win-win scenario is not realised because everyone loses if the business venture fails. In game theory, a win-win situation, also known as the win-win game or non-zero-sum game, is one in which all participants gain via collaboration, compromise, or collective engagement.
To know more about win-win scenario:
brainly.com/question/7189412
#SPJ4
Answer:
The largest disagreement perhaps amongst the framers was the issue of state representation. This issue could not be solved quickly as the creation of a checks and balances system had been. The framers soon found that the larger state delegates wanted to use population numbers to decide how many people would be chosen as delegates for Congress.
Explanation:
Judges are appointed, not elected, because the framers did not want them to focus on outside factors like getting elected.
Answer:
Social reaction theory
Explanation:
Social reaction theory is one that examines the role that societal institutions, including the juvenile justice system, play in perpetuating delinquent behavior.
