Answer: It had a History of Protecting Slavery and Segregation – This is often cited as one of the main detriments of the system of federalism that we have in this country, that since slavery was a state issue, it was something that could not be removed on the national level.
It Allows for Inequalities Between Different States – For example, instead of education funding throughout the country being the same, since it is a state issue, some states will spend more, per capita, on education than other states, causing what could be considered a disparity. The same goes for other things, as well, such as taxes, health care programs, and welfare programs.
The Blockage of Nationalist Policies by States – States can fight against the existence of certain national laws by challenging them in court, or going out of their way to not enforce those national laws, or even deliberately obstructing enforcement of national laws.
Racing to the Bottom – One argument given is that states will compete with each other in an oppositional way, by reducing the amount of benefits they give to welfare recipients compared to, say, a neighboring state, motivating the undesirables to go to the neighboring state, thereby reducing their welfare costs even more. This reduction of state benefits to needy has been deemed the ‘race to the bottom.’
Coca commonly referred to its nickname "coke" comes from coke leaves which is also used to create the drug "coke". Cola is the soda part of the euphemism
B is false because D.C. abolished slavery in 1862
Answer:
I-You Communication
Explanation:
According to my research on different types of communication, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the type of communication being defined is called I-You Communication. Like mentioned in the question this communication is when two individuals acknowledge each other as more than just objects, instead they see each other as human beings, but at the same time still do not fully engage with one another as unique individuals with thoughts and feelings on different topics.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
I don’t think it could’ve been avoided. the colonies wanted their nation to be separate from britain but britain wouldn’t give colonial america that chance. tensions were high and america wanted their independence but britain being how britain was at the time they didn’t want to give up land. they wanted an empire
