All categories

3 years ago

Using this table, calculate the marginal cost of each of

Business

1 answer:

alexandr402 [8]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

See below

Explanation:

Marginal cost is the additional expenses incurred in producing one more unit of output. Marginal cost is the expenses associated with the production of one extra unit.

In this case, there will be marginal costs in producing the first item. There is no extra unit in the first unit. Marginal costs will be zero. The second item's marginal cost will be the difference between the cost of the second and the first item.

First bike

The fourth bike:

=Forth bike - third bike

=$130 -$110

= $20

The sixth bike

=sixth - fifth

=$210 -$160

=$50

The seventh bike

=seventh - sixth

=$270 -$210

=$60

You might be interested in

Grand Lips produces a lip balm used for cold-weather sports. The balm is manufactured in a single processing department. No lip

77julia77 [94]

Answer:

a. see attachment

total equivalent units : Materials = 30,500 units and Conversion Costs = 16,860

cost per equivalent unit : Materials = $0.14 and Conversion Costs = $0.30

(a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods = $6,732

(b) units still in process at June 30 = $1,196

Journals

Work In Process :Direct Materials $4,305 (debit)

Raw Materials $4,305 (credit)

Being Raw Materials used in Production

Work In Process :Direct Labor $3,320 (debit)

Salaries Payable $3,320 (credit)

Being Labor used in Production

Work In Process ; Overheads $1,738 (debit)

Overheads $1,738 (credit)

Being Overheads Assigned to Production

Finished Goods $6,732 (debit)

Work In Process $6,732 (credit)

Being Units transferred to Finished Goods

Explanation:

Calculation of Equivalent units of Production in respect with Raw Materials and Conversion Costs

1. Materials

Ending Work In Process (5,200 × 100%) 5,200

Completed and Transferred Out (15,300 × 100%) 15,300

Equivalent units of Production in respect with Raw Materials 30,500

2. Conversion Costs

Ending Work In Process (5,200 × 30%) 1,560

Completed and Transferred Out (15,300 × 100%) 15,300

Equivalent units of Production in respect with Conversion Cost 16,860

Calculation of Cost per Equivalent unit of production in respect with Raw Materials and Conversion Costs

Unit Cost = Total Cost ÷ Total Equivalent units

1. Materials

Unit Cost = $4,305 ÷ 30,500

= $0.14

2. Conversion Costs

Unit Cost = ($3,320 + $1,738) ÷ 16,860

= $0.30

3. Total unit cost

Total unit cost = Material Cost + Conversion Cost

= $0.14 + $0.30

= $0.44

Calculation of costs assigned to (a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods and (b) units still in process at June 30.

(a) units completed and transferred to Finished Goods

Total Cost = units completed and transferred out × total unit cost

= 15,300 × $0.44

= $6,732

(b) units still in process at June 30.

Total Cost = Materials Cost + Conversion Cost

= $0.14 × 5,200 + $0.30 × 1,560

= $1,196

8 0

3 years ago

Job 148 requires $12,000 of direct materials, $6,700 of direct labor, 550 direct labor hours, and 270 machine hours. It also req

taurus [48]

Answer:

b. $26,740

Explanation:

The computation of the total amount of overhead allocated is shown below:

overhead allocated is

= (actual direct labor hour × overhead rate per direct labor hour) + (Actual machine hour × overhead rate per machine hour)

= (550 × 28) + (270 × 42]

= $15,400 + $11,340

= $26,740

hence, the total amount of overhead allocated is $26,740

6 0

3 years ago

On December 29, 2005, BJ Co. sold an equity security investment that had been purchased on January 4, 2004. BJ owned no other ma

sineoko [7]

Answer:

AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery

No No

The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.

The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.

The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.

For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

A phone call to a government official by an employee of the enron corporation disclosed the deception and dishonesty of the firm

UNO [17]

This employee played the role of a: whistleblower.

3 0

3 years ago

Kevin and Randy Muise have a jar containing 4444 coins, all of which are either quarters or nickels. The total value of the coi

aev [14]

Answer:

they have 25 quarters and 19 nickels

Explanation:

let N = number of nickels

let Q = number of quarters

5N + 25Q = 720

N + Q = 44

N = 44 - Q (now we must replace)

5(44 - Q) + 25Q = 720

220 - 5Q + 25Q = 720

20Q = 720 - 220 = 500

Q = 500 / 20 = 25

N = 44 - 25 = 19

6 0

3 years ago