Answer:
b.) Who could prove their grandfathers vote
Explanation:
Grandfather clause was a rule used in the US southern states like Alabama, Georgia, Carolina and so on at the ending of the 19th century. This law allowed only people who could prove their grandfathers or ancestors voted before the civil war or as at a particular date. The law was made so as to prevent poor and uneducated black Americans and their descendants from voting
When Joseph sees a frail man limping around the corner he owns, he will likely help if the costs of helping are small and Joseph will feel better about himself helping.
Helping someone in need corresponds to a form of empathy and altruism, which is based on the moral emotions we feel when we see a person in a situation that we have the ability to help.
According to the theory of social exchange, altruism only exists if the benefits to the helper outweigh the cost, so supported by this theory, the letter b is correct, and Joseph will help the man if the costs of helping are small.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/14669414
Likely rule against Mark.
Mark and Charles had an oral agreement over a few years and nothing was put into writing. This would trigger the statute of frauds, wherein certain types of agreements are required to be memorialized in writing.
This means that there is a situation in which two people are having to be taken at their word. On top of that, the agreement was made while they were impaired.
If a court didn't rule against Mark at the outset, there would be an investigation into whether the agreement was enforceable, how impaired they were, whether anyone else heard them, and what the historic uses were but there isn't enough time for a prescriptive easement or adverse possession. But this is likely a summary judgment case based on statute of frauds.
Austrian Ferdinand was assassinated, which was what started the war (because he was the brother of the emperor Franz Joseph)
