QUESTION Options:
a.identify strongly with the victim.
b.disparage the victim.
c.disparage the oppressor.
d.become very concerned with our own situation out of fear of suffering in the future.
Answer: Disparage the victim.
A just world hypothesis is the assumption that an individual's action is naturally likely to bring morally fair results or actions to that individual such that all honourable actions are rewarded and and evil actions are punished.
To defend our belief in a just world, when we see an individual suffering, we conclude that the suffering is as a result of their evil actions.
Answer:
is it Indian language
Explanation:
sorry but if u translate it to English I can help u
<em>Answer:</em>
<em>pragmatics </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em><u>Pragmatics,</u></em><em> in psychology, is described as the study of an individual's capability of "natural language speaker" to communicate beyond the factor that has been stated explicitly. An individual's capability to understand and comprehend speaker's or someone else's intended meaning. It encompasses the process through which words have been utilized by a person.</em>
<em><u>As per the question, Donna is demonstrating her grasp of pragmatics.</u></em>
Answer: To see how much support he or she can except
Explanation: i Took the test
Answer:
For a company, net income is the residual amount of earnings after all expenses have been deducted from sales. In short, gross income is an intermediate earnings figure before all expenses are included, and net income is the final amount of profit or loss after all expenses are included.
Explanation:
