Answer:
The correct answer is D. will result in a multiple times higher decrease in equilibrium real GDP in the short run; however, a tax-rate reduction will increase the automatic-stabilizer properties of the tax system, so equilibrium real GDP would be less stable.
Explanation:
Ricardian Equivalence is an economic theory that suggests that when a government increases expenses financed with debt to try to stimulate demand, demand does not really undergo any change.
This is because increases in the public deficit will lead to higher taxes in the future. To keep their consumption pattern stable, taxpayers will reduce consumption and increase their savings in order to offset the cost of this future tax increase.
If taxpayers reduce their consumption and increase their savings by the same amount as the debt to be returned by the government, there is no effect on aggregate demand.
The fundamental concept of Ricardian equivalence is that it does not matter which method the government chooses to increase spending, whether by issuing public debt or through taxes (applying an expansive fiscal policy), the result will be the same and demand will remain unchanged.
The type of shopping that is being identified above is
acquisitional shopping because this is where consumers have the intention of
visiting or going to the store to shop in a way that they would purchase
products and acquire for services. It could be seen above as the shopping is
characterized because of the consumers will of having to purchase a specific
product.
The correct answer would be B. Depreciation
The answer is B. antitrust laws.
Antitrust laws are designed to keep competition fair between corporations to protect consumers. These laws promote such competition and discourage monopolies from operating as such.
Answer:
$15,000
Explanation:
Gross domestic product is the sum of all final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year.
When calculating GDP, only items produced in the current year are added. The house had been sold in 2007. Adding the sale to the GDP in 2011 would lead to double counting.
It's only the amount paid to the agent that would be added to GDP.
I hope my answer helps you
