His estimate is reasonable. But only if Michael is less than 2 years old.
=4m - 17+ 3m - 11
combine like terms
=(4m + 3m) + (-17 - 11)
=7m - 28
This can be factored/simplified by dividing everything by 7
=7(m - 4)
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
50
Step-by-step explanation:
48 rounds to 50
ANSWER: 50
Answer:
The table a not represent a proportional relationship between the two quantities
The table b represent a proportional relationship between the two quantities
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form
or 
<u><em>Verify each table</em></u>
<em>Table a</em>
Let
A ----> the independent variable or input value
B ----> the dependent variable or output value
the value of k will be

For A=35, B=92 ---> 
For A=23, B=80 ---> 
the values of k are different
therefore
There is no proportional relationship between the two quantities
<em>Table b</em>
Let
C ----> the independent variable or input value
D ----> the dependent variable or output value
the value of k will be

For C=20, D=8 ---> 
For C=12.5, D=5 ---> 
the values of k are equal
therefore
There is a proportional relationship between the two quantities
The linear equation is equal to

Answer:
x = 11
y = 17
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that opposite angles (or vertical angles) are equal.
So
8x + 7 = 9x - 4
Subtract 8x from both sides of the equation
8x - 8x + 7 = 9x - 8x - 4
7 = x - 4
Add 4 to both sides of the equation
7 + 4 = x - 4 + 4
11 = x
Looking at the other 2 angles,
5y = 7y - 34
Subtract 7 y from both sides of the equation
5y - 7y = 7y - 7y - 34
-2y = -34
Divide both sides by -2
-2y/-2 = -34/-2
y = 17