The government's idea was probably that they'd fit in better, and have an easier time living amongst us and finding work if they adopted our customs, language, and all of that good stuff.
The bad effects this could have on kids, they really don't understand why they'd be forced to adopt these new ways. Mom and Dad have always taught them to do this, but the government is telling them to do that now. They might feel like outcasts, or like their ways aren't welcomed.
Interpretive claims is not necessary in a historical essay.
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
A historical essay is defined as an essay illustrating assertions about historic events that are substantiated by adequate evidence to give the viewers a greater clarity and knowledge of that specific event.
Interpretive claims are points of view which are explored and evaluated in an essay. Although interpretive claims could be well-versed and advocated by historical record, it is regarded subjective since the writer uses it to voice their opinion. They are not essential for a historical essay because those claims represent the writer's opinion or perception of an event or topic that is not far mandated in a historical essay.
The answer is D. I hope this helps!!! :)
There seemed to be two Americas because each side was very different. The east was more urban. It had more cities. The west was more rural and agricultural.
