NEED HELP ASAP! WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
1. Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
2.
And the value of a that satisfy this is a=1.96. So our critical regions are:
3.
4. If we compare the p value and a significance level assumed we see that
so we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and the actual true mean for the heights is NOT significant different than 2.05. Using the critical region founded on part 2 we agree with the decision obtained with the p value since -1 is not on the critical zones, so we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.
Step-by-step explanation:
Data given and notation
represent the sample mean
represent the standard deviation for the population
sample size
represent the value that we want to test
represent the significance level for the hypothesis test.
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value for the test (variable of interest)
1) The null and alternative hypotheses should be ?
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to determine if the mean change from 2.05, the system of hypothesis would be:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
2. Using the critical value to set up the decision rule, the decision rule should be?
For this case we need two critical values since we are conducting a two tailed test. We have this equality:
And the value of a that satisfy this is a=1.96. So our critical regions are:
3. The test statistic of this test is?
We know the population deviation, so for this case is better apply a z test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:
(1)
z-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".
We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:
4. The conclusion of this test should be
Since is a two tailed test the p value would be:
Conclusion
If we compare the p value and a significance level assumed we see that
so we can conclude that we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and the actual true mean for the heights is NOT significant different than 2.05. Using the critical region founded on part 2 we agree with the decision obtained with the p value since -1 is not on the critical zones, so we FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.