Answer:
B, D, and E.
Step-by-step explanation:
A) The system has infinitely many solutions. This is wrong because according to the graph, there is only one solution- where the lines intersect. This would only be true if the lines never intersected.
B) A solution to the system is (-1, -2). This is true because this is the only point where the lines intersect.
C) A solution to the system is (0, -1). Since these aren't parabolas and the one above is true, we can say this is false. Also, the lines don't intersect at (0, -1).
D) One of the equations is y=x-1. This is true because the y-intercept for the red line is -1 and the slope of the equation is 1. You can also find this out by directly solving for the equation.
E) One of the equations is 3x+y=-5. If you put this into slope-intercept form, you will find out that the equation is y=-3x-5. This is true because the y-intercept of this is -5 and the slope of this is -3.
Answer: question 2 b = $3.5992
question 2 c = $48.5892 or you can write $48.58
thats how much i know i dont know about the rest sorry
i will try them out and come back to you if i find an answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
ln(5/3)
Step-by-step explanation:
The desired limit represents the logarithm of an indeterminate form, so L'Hopital's rule could be applied. However, the logarithm can be simplified to a form that is not indeterminate.
<h3>Limit</h3>
We can cancel factors of (x-1), which are what make the expression indeterminate at x=1. Then the limit can be evaluated directly by substituting x=1.
Answer:
This is very detailed as I wish to make some principles about fractions clear.
3
5
12
Explanation:
This question boils down to
3
2
3
−
1
4
A fractions structure is that of:
count
size indicator of what you are counting
→
numerator
denominator
You can not directly add or subtract the counts (numerators) unless the size indicators (denominators) are the same.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
3
2
3
Write as
3
+
2
3
Multiply by 1 and you do not change the value. However, 1 comes in many forms so you can change the way something looks without changing its true value
[
3
×
1
]
+
2
3
[
3
×
3
3
]
+
2
3
9
3
+
2
3
=
11
3
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Putting it all together
3
2
3
−
1
4
→
11
3
−
1
4
But the size indicators are not the same. I chose to make them become 12
11
3
−
1
4
→
[
11
3
×
1
]
−
[
1
4
×
1
]
→
[
11
3
×
4
4
]
−
[
1
4
×
3
3
]
→
44
12
−
3
12
Now we may subtract the counts
→
44
−
3
12
=
41
12
But this is the same as
12
12
+
12
12
+
12
12
+
5
12
=
1
2
+
2
1
2
+
2
1
2
+
5
12
=
3
5
12
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
15
Step-by-step explanation:
18 . ( 14 - 9 ) ÷ [ 12 - ( 19 - 13 ) ]
18 . ( 5 ) ÷ [ 12 - 6 ]
90 ÷ 6
15
