A. They were trying to find a trade route to make trading easier, so they explored a whole lot more.
B. The Colombian Exchange contributed to the rise of slave trade because when they picked up goods, they just piled 100 or so slaves in the bottom deck. Once a few people had some, many others began to want them and supply and demand skyrocketed. It was easy because the slaves had a different skin color and spoke a different language. The Europeans did not see them as people.
<span> national economies are NOT relatively self-contained entities.
Because of the globalization, it is easier for the people in a certain country to communicate with other people in another country.
This improves the chance of bilateral relationships between more than one countries and make their production process will be integrated to serve one another better.</span>
No, he can say that's your opinion, but that is a weak ethical argument, he needs to say why he disagrees, and what are his view points on his reasoning, like why does he believe what he believes, just as person A does.
Answer:
"The use of silk which was once bound to the nobility has now spread to all classes without qualification, even to the most minimal." The demand of silk kept on expanding consistently throughout the long term. The cost of silk was amazingly high in antiquated Rome.
Explanation:
From about the fourth century BC, the Greeks and Romans started discussing Seres, the kingdom of Silk. A few historians accept the main Romans to set eyes upon the astonishing texture were the armies of Marcus Licinius Crassus, Legislative head of Syria.
