The correct answer is: Option B.
People cannot be excluded from using public kids while they can be excluded from using individual goods.
A Public good can be used by everyone without exclusion or rivarly. For example: my consumption of a public good would never affect other people's consumption. Going for a ride in a public park would exemplify it perfectly. If I go for a ride in a public park would not affect the the right of another person to do the same thing. In the other hand, a private good is reserved for the consumer individually, it is excludable because it can restrict another consumers from using it, for several reasons as payment exchange, and it is rival due to limited quantity. Example: not everyone can buy a car due its price. Some people can do it, other people cannot, due to their purchasing power. If a car company of a certain brand manufactures a limited quantity of cars, not everyone could buy it for there would not be enough cars for a massive demand. That defines the rivalry.
Yes, binge drinking can be 4/5 drinks or more
Answer:
Color perception deficit
Explanation:
Color vision deficiency is the lack of ability to differentiate certain shades of color. The term "color blindness" can also be used to explain this visual challenge, but a very small number of people are entirely color blind.
Color vision deficiency can range from a mild condition to a severe case, depending on the cause. It can even affect both eyes if it is hereditary and generally just one if it is caused by illness or injury.
This condition is likely due to photoreceptors in the retina of the eye identified as cones. These cones have a light-sensitive pigment that allows us to identify different colors.
Answer:
President Andrew Jackson responded to this decision by <em><u>ignoring the ruling and allowing Georgia to evict the Cherokee Nation</u></em>.
Explanation:
The 1832 Supreme Court case of Worcester v. Georgia was a result of the state of Georgia mandating the 'white' missionaries to take permission and pledge allegiance to the state before they venture into the Cherokee nation/ settlements. This would become the turning point for the removal of the native Indians from their homes later.
When the state of Georgia tried to impose laws even to the Cherokee territories, white missionaries like Samuel A. Worcester advised the Indians to oppose such actions. The Indians are an autonomous nation and were not under any obligation to be under any law imposed by the government. When the Cherokee people refused to imply with the new law, which also included the missionaries to take permission from the state government and also to pledge allegiance to the state, the case was taken to the Supreme Court.
The court also ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokee nation, stating that the Georgia government has no power to impose any rules over the autonomous Indian territory. It was then that President Andrew Jackson refused to comply with the ruling and allowed Georgia to continue with its attempts to 'disrupt' the Cherokee people. This will eventually lead to what will be known as the Trail of Tears, which was a major removal of the Indian people from their lands.
Thus, the correct answer is the second option.