Answer:
The first mover that creates a revolutionary product is in a monopoly position.
Explanation:
First Mover is the big initiator of a new product, which gains a competitive 'first mover advantage' for being the pioneer of the idea in the market.
- The first mover can be able to establish brand loyalty
- Being a first mover doesn't guarantee instant success
- The first mover can create switching costs for its customers to deter rivals.
The only apt statement is : The first mover that creates a revolutionary product is in a monopoly position. The first mover enters the market when there is no major supplier & the customer's demand is unmet. If it enables to leverage the potential huge unsatisfied market in a revolutionary way, it can be able to create unparalleled brand loyalty. And this can make it secure monopoly position in market
Answer:
the best way is phone
Explanation:
becuase to get all of them in a group and tell them all
Answer:
790,000, i.e. $79 x 10,000= 790,000
. Yes, the manufacturer should change the design. 666,667 (when it goes from 1/10,000 to 1/15,000). It is 500,000 (when it goes from 1/10,000 but 1/20,000)
. No, the benevolent social planner would not agree with the manufacturer's decision.
Explanation:
In the estimates provided by the manufacturer, the total cost of the design is equivalent to $79 x 10,000= 790,000. There should be an alteration in the design to remove the necessary precautions. If the probability is different from the estimate provided by the manufacturer, the planner will disagree with the decision made by the manufacturer. For example, a change to 1/15000 will make the total cost to be approximately $666,667.
Answer:
1. <em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>2<em>. If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John which will be $80,000</em>
<em />
Explanation:
In contributory negligence, the defense completely bars plaintiffs from any recovery if they contribute to their own injury through their own negligence.
<em>If this law of contributory negligence applies to the state, then Ramona will receive no compensation for the damages she sustained. </em>
<em>
</em>
In comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages is award by the percentage of fault that the fact-finder assigns to the plaintiff for his or her own injury i.e the plaintiff's damage compensation is reduced by percentage of his/her percentage of fault.
<em>If this law of comparative negligence applies to this state, then Ramona will get 100% - 20% = 80% of the damages incurred in the accident, from John</em>
this is 80% of $100,00 which is equal to <em>$80,000</em>
Answer:
He has a teenage daughter that was pregnant or with a little child.
Explanation:
The Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) vouchers are vouchers provided by the federal government to states to ensure that low income pregnant teenager or women, infants and children have access to supplemental food, healthcare, etc. This is in a bid to ensure that every pregnant woman, their children or infants are well taken care of and have access to better health system among other things.
These vouchers cater for over millions of people through their over 40,000 merchants all over the world.
Cheers.
