All categories

3 years ago

In 2–3 sentences, describe how you would conduct a search for a single record.

1 answer:

7 0

There are several ways you can find a record. The easiest way is by using the find command. You can do this by pressing the combination keys Control + F. You will then see a mini search box in the top right corner of your screen. Lastly, type in the word, phrase, or record that you want to find. You will then be directed to several highlighted words, and TADA! :D

Hope this helps :)

You might be interested in

The equivalent units in beginning work in process inventory plus the equivalent units in ending work in process inventory equals

vivado [14]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

The formula for equivalent units units as follows:

Opening Work in Process + Equivalent units on which the work is done - Closing Work in process = Units Transferred

Therefore, ideally,

Opening work in process - Closing work in process = Units transferred - Equivalent units on which work is done.

As adding all the cost incurred during the period to opening inventory of work in process, we get the total cost for the period, thereafter, deducting the cost allocated to closing work in process we get the value of goods produced and transferred.

Therefore, above statement is false.

8 0

3 years ago

Manufacturing cost data for Orlando Company, which uses a job order cost system, are presented below. Indicate the missing amoun

mafiozo [28]

Answer:

a= 54796

h= 80,824

d=117916

i=67915.68

e=$ 352196

b= 58,800

f= 373496

j= 234500

c= 15100

k= 1900

g=3721596

Explanation:

Orlando Company

Manufacturing Cost Data

Case A Case B Case C

Direct materials used (a) $91,200 $69,000

a=149,800 - 42,804- 52,200 54796

Direct labor 52,200 143,800 (h)

$69,000 +x+0.82h= 216100

1.82h= 216100-69000

h= 147100/1.82= 80,824 80,824

Manufacturing overhead applied 42,804 (d) (i)

d=82% of 143,800=117916 117916

i=82% of 80824 = 67915.68 67915.68

Total manufacturing costs 149,800 (e) 216,100

e=$91,200+ 143,800+ 117916 352196

Work in process 1/1/14 (b) 21,300 18,400

b=208,600- 149,800 58,800

Total cost of work in process 208,600 (f) (j)

f=352196+ 21,300 373496

j=216,100 + 18,400 234500

Work in process 12/31/14 (c) 11,900 (k)

c=208,600 - 193,500 15100

k=234500 -232,600 1900

Cost of goods manufactured 193,500 (g) 232,600

g=373496- 11,900 3721596

The formulas used are given below.

Total Manufacturing Cost = Direct Materials + Direct Labor + Factory Overheads

Total cost of work in process= Total manufacturing costs+ Opening Work in process

Cost of goods manufactured= Total cost of work in process - Closing Work in process

In each of these if two amounts are known we can find the third one.We can also do rearrange these to find the required amounts.The calculation of each of the missing amount has been done next to it.

5 0

3 years ago

Sims Company, a manufacturer of tablet computers, began operations on January 1, 2019. Its cost and sales information for this y

kakasveta [241]

Answer:

Results are below.

Explanation:

Absorption vs Variable costing method

The absorption costing method includes all costs related to production, both fixed and variable. The unit product cost is calculated using direct material, direct labor, and total unitary manufacturing overhead.

The variable costing method incorporates all variable production costs (direct material, direct labor, and variable overhead).

1) First, we need to calculate the total unitary variable cost:

Unitary production variable cost= 35 + 55 + 40= $130

Selling and administrative costs for the year Variable $ 725,000

Unitary total variable cost= 130 + (725,000 / 80,000)= $139.06

Now, the variable income statement:

Sales= 80,000*350= 28,000,000

Total variable cost= (80,000*139.06)=(11,124,800)

Total contribution margin= 16,875,200

Fixed overhead= (6,600,000)

Fixed Selling and administrative costs = (4,250,000)

Net operating income= 6,025,200

2) First, we need to calculate the unitary production cost:

Unitary production cost= 130 + (6,600,000/110,000)= $190

Now, the absorption costing income statement:

Sales= 28,000,000

COGS= 80,000*190= (15,200,000)

Gross profit= 12,800,000

Total Selling and administrative costs= (725,000 + 4,250,000)= (4,975,000)

Net operating income= 7,825,000

5 0

3 years ago

Since a cell phone is a private good, if Neha chooses to spend $300 on a cell phone, Neha would get $300 of benefit from the cel

stiks02 [169]

Answer:

In other words, if Neha decides to keep the $300 for a cell phone and Teresa decides to contribute the $300 to the public project, then Neha would receive a total benefit of:

$570.

Explanation:

Neha has, in this situation, maximized his benefits to the detriment of the public good. This is an illustration of the tragedy of the commons. The tragedy of the common is an economic problem that explains the loss that the society incurs when some persons like Neha neglect to contribute to the common good because they are solely concentrated on pursuing their individual goals for personal gains.

4 0

3 years ago

Stan wants to start an IRA that will have $250,000 in it when he retires in 25 years. How much should he invest semiannually in

Wittaler [7]

25 years: No Payment, but total is 250000
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1/2 year later is P(1+0.03)
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1 year later is P(1+0.03)^2
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 1½ years later is P(1+0.03)^3
6 months earlier. Payment of "P". It's value 2 years later is P(1+0.03)^4

We need to recognize these patterns. Similarly, we can identify the accumulated value of all 50 payments of "P". Starting from the last payment normally is most clear.

P(1.03) + P(1.03)^2 + P(1.03)^3 + ... + P(1.03)^50
That needs to make sense. After that, it's an algebra problem.
P[(1.03) + (1.03)^2 + (1.03)^3 + ... + (1.03)^50]

P(1.03−1.03^51)/(1−1.03) = 250000

8 0

3 years ago