Answer:
The answer is negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, negative reinforcement occurs when an unpleasant stimulus is removed after a behaviour is completed. In the example, the nagging will stop once the job has been done.
Negative reinforcement has been proved to be more effective than positive reinforcement (rewards).
Other job description of order getters are generating customer leads and acting as a mediator between the customer and the functioning departments of their firm. Basically, they are the front line salespeople so they get a lot of support from the technical team and the merchandisers.
Answer with Explanation:
The evaluation of every matter requires a framework based on a useful ideas that are required for a better judgement for deriving a solution like if we want to resolve a mathematical problem, then we will use mathematical functions like +, -, *, etc so that we are able to solve the question because these are the ideas that are based on a useful ideas (Logic). Likewise when we want to assess whether the argument is good or not, we will require an ethical standard framework to evaluate the good in the argument.
So yes, I agree that ethics is an essential element of a good argument because it is the framework which decides which argument is good or not. These ethical values in a particular argument is a move from not good to good argument. Greater the ethical values in an argument the more is the argument good as per ethical principles.
