None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
The answer is "all of the answers".
When you are going to participate in an assigned driver program and furnish the designated driver with complimentary nonalcoholic beverages. In any case, you should meet certain criteria previously you get this advantage: Be no less than 21 years of age, be a piece of a gathering of at least two, recognize yourself as the assigned driver, refrain from expending liquor while out, and don't devour medications or whatever else that would disable the driver.
The answer is the highlighted part of it i’m sure
Answer:
because it leads to gaining insight, which them leads to wisdom, which advances to calmness, knowledge, to the Sam bodhi, and finally, to Nirvana.
Explanation:
