1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lady bird [3.3K]
3 years ago
12

A large nationwide company with 1200 employees claims that the number of days missed by its employees due to illness is below th

e national average of 7. A random sample of 40 employees resulted in a mean of 6.6 days with a standard deviation of 1.8. The hypothesis test resulted in a p-value of 0.084. Which of the following statements is true?
A. There is a 10% chance that the null hypothesis is true and a 8.3% chance that the alternative hypothesis is true.
B. There is a 8.3% chance that the mean number of days missed by employees at the company is below 7.
C. Since the probability that the mean number of days is below 7 is small, the null hypothesis is likely true.
D. If the mean number of days missed the company is 7 the probability of obtaining a sample mean of 66 days or lower is 0.063.
Mathematics
1 answer:
goldfiish [28.3K]3 years ago
4 0

The last part of the question before the options is meant to be;

The hypothesis test using α = 0.1 resulted in a p-value of 0.084. Which of the following statements is true?

Answer:

B: There is a 8.3% chance that the mean number of days missed by employees at the company is below 7.

Step-by-step explanation:

Significance value is α = 0.1

p-value = 0.084

Now, we want to test the claims that the number of days missed by its employees due to illness is below the national average of 7.

Now the p-value is basically a probability.

Thus, p = 0.084 can be written as 8.4%

It seems this 8.4 is an approximate version of 8.3 because the options use 8.3%.

Thus, Option B is the closest answer.

You might be interested in
Check all of the steps that would be used to solve this equation: 2(x-5)=24
aliya0001 [1]
X=17

Distribute 2(x-5)
You are left with 2x-10=24
You then want to get 2x by itself so add 10 on both sides so that you get 2x=34
Isolate x completely by dividing by 2 on both sides which then leaves you with x=17
8 0
3 years ago
John owns a hardware store. He has at most $1,000 to spend on restocking his pipes. Steel pipes cost $100, and plastic pipes cos
Llana [10]
If there is $1,000 for the pipes, then you can buy 5 steel pipes for $500 and to plastic for 500 too. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1 point) Use Stoke's Theorem to evaluate ∫CF⋅dr∫CF⋅dr where F(x,y,z)=xi+yj+1(x2+y2)kF(x,y,z)=xi+yj+1(x2+y2)k and CC is the bound
Drupady [299]

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

Thinking process:

\int\limits^a_b {cF} \, .dr

= \int\limits^a_b {x} \, dx \int\limits^a_b {x} \, dx curlFdS by Stoke's Theorem

= \int\limits^a_b {} \,  \int\limits^a_b {} \, < 12y, -12x, 0 > .< z_x,-z_y, 1 > dA\\= \int\limits^a_b {} \, \int\limits^a_b {} \, < 12y, -12x, 0 > .< 2x, 2y, 1 > dA since z = 25-x^{2} -y^{2} \\= 0

3 0
3 years ago
Gavin thinks the equation P = 3 × 4 could be used to find the perimeter for two different
kondaur [170]
This shape is a Rectangle because the sides aren’t even
5 0
3 years ago
Explain which event is more likely: rolling two dice and getting a total of 11, or, tossing a coin and getting three Heads in a
amm1812

Answer:

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the erroneous belief that if a particular event occurs more frequently than normal during the past it is less likely to happen in the future (or vice versa), when it has otherwise been established that the probability of such events does not depend on what has happened in the past. Such events, having the quality of historical independence, are referred to as statistically independent. The fallacy is commonly associated with gambling, where it may be believed, for example, that the next dice roll is more than usually likely to be six because there have recently been fewer than the usual number of sixes.

The term "Monte Carlo fallacy" originates from the best known example of the phenomenon, which occurred in the Monte Carlo Casino in 1913.[1]

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the value of c?
    8·1 answer
  • 17 is 2.5% of what number?
    5·2 answers
  • A line with a slope of -10 passes through the points of (10, -7) and (9,j) what is the value of j?
    11·1 answer
  • What is the leg length of an isosceles right triangle with a hypotenuse of 32 inches?
    8·2 answers
  • HOW TO ROUND 103.468 TO LITERS
    7·1 answer
  • Which of these sentences is always true for a parallelogram?
    14·2 answers
  • Does anyone know how to get a tutor? the option isn’t their for me anymore
    15·1 answer
  • Simplify the Absolute value of 120+x , if x&lt;−120
    8·1 answer
  • 4. A car is travelling 75 kilometers per hour. How many meters does the car travel in one
    9·2 answers
  • Write your question here. We can't read your mind. Yet.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!