1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexdok [17]
3 years ago
11

The United Nations Human Development Report gives the following data for real GDP per person in​ 2014: China,​ $12,547; Russia,​

$22,352; Canada,​ $42,155; United​ States, $52,947.
Other information suggests that household production is similar in Canada and the United States and smaller than in China and Russia. The underground economy is larger in Russia and China and a similar proportion of each of these economies. Canadians and Americans enjoy more leisure hours than do the Chinese and Russians. Canada and the United States spend significantly more on the environment than do China and Russia. In which pair​ (or pairs) of countries is it easiest to compare the standard of​ living?
And in which pair​ (or pairs) is it most​ difficult? Explain why?
Business
1 answer:
Leviafan [203]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. between China and Russia or between Canada and the United​ States, because household​ production, the underground​ economy, leisure​ hours, and the environment are similar in each pair

Explanation:

The standard of living can be easily compared​ ______.     A. between China and Canada because they have a similar land size   B. between China and Russia or between Canada and the United​ States, because household​ production, the underground​ economy, leisure​ hours, and the environment are similar in each pair   C. among none of the four countries because they are too different   D. between Russia and the United States because they are both super powers   E. among all four countries because real GDP per person includes a reliable measure of​ income, household​ production, the underground​ economy, leisure​ hours, and the environment

Real Per capita GDP measures the standard of living of the people in a country. The higher the Real Per capita GDP, the higher the standard of living

Real Per capita GDP = Real GDP / population  

Gross domestic product is the total sum of final goods and services produced in an economy within a given period which is usually a year

Real GDP is GDP calculated using base year prices. Real GDP has been adjusted for inflation.

some items are not perfectly measured by GDP. They include

1. services not rendered to oneself

2. Activities not reported to the government  

3. illegal activities

4. sale or purchase of used products

5. sale or purchase of intermediate products

Because GDP does not measure underground economy (illegal activities) , leisure , it would be difficult to compare either pair of countries

 

You might be interested in
Due to the limited range of input and interaction among participants, few companies believe that a joint application development
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

It is false that Joint Application Development (JAD) group produces the best definition of a new system.

Explanation:

JAD group does not produce the best definition of a new system, here is why:

• JAD system incorporates participants with different opinions. Different opinions within the team make it difficult to align goals and maintain focus

• Depending on the size of the project, JAD may require a longer time that will put a strain on the execution of a project

• JAD is too expensive and can be cumbersome/difficult if group is too large

• JAD produces a details and information that is a tentative model not a complete development methodology.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Glenn is the R&D manager with Quick Print Inc. The company is having a problem with one of its most popular copiers jamming.
xeze [42]

Answer:

Problem Analysis

Explanation:

Problem analysis also known as 'root cause' analysis ensures that “root causes,” not just the symptoms of the problem, are identified and subsequently addressed.

This step comes after the problem identification stage of problem solving.

Therefore as stated in the scenario ''When Glenn analyzes the underlying causes of the paper-jam problem, he is performing the function of problem analysis

5 0
3 years ago
Paquette purchased a building and land and immediately tore down the building how should they record the expense?
hammer [34]

Paquette purchased

federalism

a building and land and immediately tore down the building

Reconstruction

.

Reconstruction

failed by most other measures: Radical Republican legislation ultimately failed to protect former slaves from white persecution and failed to engender fundamental changes to the social fabric of the South. When President Rutherford B.

federalism

debate that had been an issue since the 1790s almost mediately . Hayes removed federal troops from the South in 1877, former Confederate officials and slave returned to With the support of a conservative Supreme Court, these newly empowered white southern politicians passed black codes, voter qualifications, and other anti-progressive legislation to reverse the rights that blacks had gained during Radical Reconstruction. The U.S. Supreme Court bolstered this anti-progressive movement federalism  with decisions in the Slaughterhouse Cases, the Civil Rights Cases, and United States v.

Learn more about

Reconstruction

on:
brainly.com/question/24761999

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Manufacturing cost data for Orlando Company, which uses a job order cost system, are presented below. Indicate the missing amoun
denis23 [38]

Answer:

Orlando Company

Indication of the missing amount for each letter:

a) = $53,150 ($145,650 - 50,000 - 42,500)

b) = $55,850 (201,500 - 145,650)

c) = $9,200 (201,500 - $192,300)

d) = $119,000 ($140,000 * 85%)

e) = $342,000 ($83,000 + $140,000 + $119,000)

f) = $357,500 ($342,000 + $15,500)

g) = $345,700 ($357,500 - $11,800)

h) = $81,000 = ($149,850 * 100/185)

h) and i) = $149,850 ($213,000 - $63,150)

$149,850 = 185% (100 + 85%)

i) = $68,850 ($149,850 * 85/185)

j) = $231,000 ($213,000 + $18,000)

k) = $9,000 ($231,000 - $222,000)

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

                                                          Job 1         Job 2         Job 3

Direct materials used                       $(a)        $83,000     $63,150

Direct labor                                    50,000      140,000         (h)

Manufacturing overhead applied 42,500         (d)                 (i)

Total manufacturing costs          145,650          (e)           213,000

Work in process 1/1/14                       (b)           15,500        18,000

Total cost of work in process   201,500            (f)                 (j)

Work in process 12/31/14                  (c)            11,800            (k)

Cost of goods manufactured   192,300            (g)         222,000

                                                          Job 1         Job 2           Job 3

Direct materials used                   $53,150     $83,000       $63,150

Direct labor                                    50,000      140,000         81,000

Manufacturing overhead applied 42,500       119,000        68,850

Total manufacturing costs          145,650      342,000      213,000

Work in process 1/1/14                  55,850         15,500        18,000

Total cost of work in process    201,500       357,500     231,000

Work in process 12/31/14              9,200           11,800         9,000

Cost of goods manufactured    192,300      345,700     222,000

a) = $53,150 ($145,650 - 50,000 - 42,500)

b) = $55,850 (201,500 - 145,650)

c) = $9,200 (201,500 - $192,300)

d) = $119,000 ($140,000 * 85%)

e) = $342,000 ($83,000 + $140,000 + $119,000)

f) = $357,500 ($342,000 + $15,500)

g) = $345,700 ($357,500 - $11,800)

h) = $81,000 = ($149,850 * 100/185)

h and 1 = $149,850 ($213,000 - $63,150)

$149,850 = 185%

i) = $68,850 ($149,850 * 85/185)

j) = $231,000 ($213,000 + $18,000)

k) = $9,000 ($231,000 - $222,000)

6 0
2 years ago
Changes in accounting estimates are: Multiple Choice Extraordinary items. Accounted for with a cumulative "catch-up" adjustment.
Tom [10]

Answer:

The answer is D. Accounted for in current and future periods.

Explanation:

A change in accounting estimate is an adjustment of the carrying value of an asset or liability arising from reassessing the expected future economic benefits and obligations associated with that asset or liability.

Changes in accounting estimates must be shown in the accounting period in which the estimates are revised and periods after i.e accounted for prospectively. Example is a change in useful life and salvage value of a fixed asset

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Vending machines are most often used to sell:
    15·1 answer
  • If a consumer sees an ad about a man or a woman who can no longer fit into his or her old bathing suit, the consumer might think
    14·1 answer
  • It ONLY makes sense to implement an ABC system when: A. ABC provides information to make better decisions. B. Its benefits excee
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose that 6-month, 12-month, 18-month, 24-month, and 30-month zero rates are 3%, 3.2%, 3.4%, 3.5%, and 3.6% per annum with co
    8·1 answer
  • . ___ is not a revenue-related motive for direct foreign investment. a. Attracting new sources of demand b. Fully benefiting fro
    15·1 answer
  • Assume that securitization combined with borrowing and irrational exuberance in Hyperville have driven up the value of existing
    14·1 answer
  • Ralph gives his daughter, Angela, stock (basis of $8,000; fair market value of $6,000). No gift tax results. If Angela subsequen
    6·1 answer
  • What happens in the labor market when the following event occurs?
    10·1 answer
  • If a call option has a $10 strike price, and the underlying stock is trading at $11, then the option is considered: a. in the mo
    14·1 answer
  • Those who lie to others can begin to perceive the recipients of the lies as less honest and trustworthy. This phenomenon is term
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!