Question

In ___________, the Supreme Court held that if a person accused of a felony cannot afford an attorney, one must be made available to the accused at the governments expense.

Answer 1

Answer:

Gideon v. Wainwright

Explanation:

According to my research on Supreme Court Cases, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the case in question was the Gideon v. Wainwright case. This case was argued and settled in 1963, which caused the supreme court to unanimously rule that an attorney must be made available to any defendant you cannot afford one at the governments expense.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

Answer 2

Answer:

In Wainwright (1963), the Supreme Court held that if a person accused of a felony cannot afford an attorney, one must be made available to the accused at the governments expense.

Explanation:

Clarence Earl Gideon was a defendant who existed in Florida and was convicted of committing serious crimes. He came without a lawyer and requested that the court appoint him one. However, the court denied the petition and he ended up representing itself, which did not turn out well. Gideon later filed a petition for habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court, saying the decision of the court violated his constitutional right. This request was also denied but resulted in the implementation of this new rule.

In 1963, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Gideon v. Wainwright Abe Fortas, a lawyer from Washington, D.C. and future judge of the Supreme Court, represented Gideon for free.