Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 421-446.
<h3>Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition?</h3>
A refereed publication with a global reach, Studies in Second Language Acquisition is devoted to the scientific topic of learning or using heritage and non-native languages. In addition to essays on current theoretical topics, each volume's four issues contain research pieces that are either quantitative or qualitative in nature. Replication Studies, Critical Commentaries, and Research Reports are examples of shorter publications that fall under other rubrics.
Ehrlich, S. (1997). Gender as social practice: Implications for second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 421-446. This essay analyzes recent work on language and gender and discusses how it relates to gender-based studies of second language learning. Recent work has rejected categorical and fixed ideas of social identities in favor of more constructivist and dynamic ones. This is true of sociolinguistics in general and language and gender study in particular.
Learn more about Second Language Acquisition here:
brainly.com/question/11412810
#SPJ4
Option C is the one that should be used to fill in the gaps ( individual; group and individual).
<h3>
What do civil liberties entail?</h3>
Civil liberties are safeguards against the activities of the government. The First Amendment to the Bill of Rights, for example, allows Americans the freedom to practice whichever religion they want. As a result, the government is prohibited from interfering with an individual's right to worship.
Hence, The focus of civil liberties is the individual group, and the focus of civil rights is the individual.
Learn more about civil liberties :
brainly.com/question/1142564
#SPJ1
Yes, I would definitely support the Compromise of 1850 as it was fundamental to defuse a four-year political confrontation between slave and free states on the status of territories acquired during the Mexican–American War (1846–1848).
All five separate bills were essential, especially when taking into account their influence over the abolitionist movement.
1. It was import to admit California as a free state.
2. Utah and New Mexico territory had to decide on slavery by popular sovereignty.
3. Texas's boundaries were set at their present form, avoiding further conflicts.
4. Slavery trade was abolished in the District of Columbia - which is the first step to abolish slavery itself.
5. The Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened, which furthered the abolitionist cause.
