Answer: increased, trade- offs, marginal thinking, small.
Explanation:
According to the passage, The coach is weighing a slightly<u> increased </u>risk of losing against a slightly decreased risk of injury to the star quarterback. This weighing o<u>f trade-offs </u>is an example of <u>marginal thinking,</u> because the star quarterback was in for most of the game, and the coach's decision concerns <u>small </u>shifts in probabilities with the game nearly over.
Answer:
Option (d) , Bank 4 offers the highest amount after a year
Explanation:
The total amount from each of the interest rates can be expressed as;
A=P(1+r/n)^nt
where;
A=Future value of investment
P=Initial value of investment
r=Annual interest rate
n=Number of times the interest is compounded annually
t=number of years of the investment
a). Bank 1
P=x
r=6.1%=6.1/100=0.061
n=1
t=assume number of years=1
replacing;
A=x(1+0.061/1)^(1×1)
A=x(1.061)
A=1.061 x
b). Bank 2
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=12
t=1
Replacing;
A=x(1+0.06/12)^(12×1)
A=x(1.005)^12
A=1.0617 x
c). Bank 3
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=1
t=1
Replacing;
A=x(1+0.06/1)^(1)
A=1.0600 x
d). Bank 4
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=4
t=1
A=x(1+0.06/4)^(4×1)
A=x(1+0.015)^4
A=x(1.061)
A=1.0614 x
e). Bank 5
P=x
r=6%=6/100=0.06
n=365
t=1
A=x(1+0.06/365)^(365×1)
A=1.0618
Option (d) , Bank 4 offers the highest amount after a year
Answer and Explanation:
The preparation of the income statement is presented below:
<u>Particulars Amount </u>
Revenue $160,000
Less:
Rental Costs $30,000
Variable Costs $50,000
Depreciation $10,000
Profit before tax $70,000
Tax at 35% -$24,500
Net Income $45,500
Hence, the net income is $45,500
Answer:
The correct answer is: The second worker.
Explanation:
Productivity is an economic term describing the relationship between outputs as compared to inputs needed to produce those outputs. It is a measure of efficiency. Typically inputs are raw materials, labor, and capital assets. Outputs are generally expressed as either revenue or total units of finished goods.
In the example, a form to measure each worker's productivity is comparing how many plastic labels they can place per hour. Thus:
- Worker 1: <em>1000 per 1/2 hour (30 minutes)
</em>
- Worker 1: <em>2000 per 1 hour </em>
- Worker 2: <em>850 per 1/3 hour (20 minutes)</em>
- Worker 2: <em>2550 per 1 hour
</em>
Then, the second worker is more productive.
Answer:
(A) Because the regulation effectively reduced the price of cool air, consumers with sufficiently elastic demand might have bought substantially more of it.
Explanation:
If the demand for energy services remains constant, improving energy efficiency will reduce energy consumption and carbon emissions. However, many efficiency improvements do not reduce energy consumption by the amount provided by simple engineering models. This is because they make energy services cheaper and therefore increases the consumption of those services.
For example, since low-fuel vehicles make travel cheaper, consumers can choose to drive further, thus offsetting some of the possible energy savings. Similarly, an extensive historical analysis of improvements in technological efficiency has conclusively demonstrated that improvements in energy efficiency were almost always overcome by economic growth, which resulted in a net increase in resource use and associated contamination.