To have happy consumers and welcoming them so they can come back knowing that the company has really good customer service and which is a huge thing in owning a business. If you can communicate to your consumers then its pretty bad.
Answer:
b. decrease
Explanation:
In the EOQ model, if carrying costs increase while all other costs remain unchanged, the number of orders placed would be expected to <u>decrease</u>.
Carrying cost is placed in denominator of the EOQ formula hence as we increase denominator the total quantity will fall. If the carrying cost is high, then we would place lesser order to reduce such costs.
Also, if carrying costs decrease while all other costs remain unchanged, the number of orders placed would be expected to decrease because there is already excess of inventory due to which the new orders have to be decreased to utilize the already pending inventory.
Answer:
a) Firm’s return on assets = 11.46 %
b) Return on stockholders’ equity = 19.37%
c) Profit margin = 3.27%
Explanation:
a) Return on assets = 
= 
b) Return on stockholder's equity = 
Equity =Total assets - Debt = $1,710,000 - $698,000 = $1,012,000
Return on equity = 
c) Asset Turnover ratio = 
= 3.5
then Net sales = 3.5 X Total Assets = = 3.5 X $1,710,000 = $5,985,000
Profit margin = ![\frac{Net profit}{Net sales} X 100 [tex]= \frac{196,000}{5,985,000} X 100 = 3.27 percent](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7BNet%20profit%7D%7BNet%20sales%7D%20X%20100%20%5Btex%5D%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B196%2C000%7D%7B5%2C985%2C000%7D%20X%20100%20%3D%203.27%20percent)
a) Firm’s return on assets = 11.46 %
b) Return on stockholders’ equity = 19.37%
c) Profit margin = 3.27%
Question Completion with options:
a. Past performance information provided directly by the offeror should not be relied upon.
b. The past performance evaluation satisfies the responsibility determination required under FAR subpart 9.1.
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
d. Offerors with demonstrated past performance that is neither relevant nor recent must not be removed from further consideration for award.
Answer:
The statement that is true regarding the evaluation of the past performance is:
c. Evaluations should take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies.
Explanation:
It has been established that past performance is the best indicator of future performance. Past performance can predict future performance, behavior, and success. Organizations that achieve some good performance in the past build the required confidence, which will help them to forge ahead in the present and future. This is why in selecting companies for a negotiated competitive services acquisition, even the past performance of predecessor companies should be reviewed to get a better handle on the company's ability to deliver on the projects.
Answer: $545,454.55
Explanation:
Caroline's share of the profit would be her sharing ratio over the total ratio time the net income.
= (6 / ( 6 + 2 + 3)) * 1,000,000
= 6/11 * 1,000,000
= $545,454.545
= $545,454.55
