An efficient portfolio maximizes return for a given level of risk or minimizes risk for a given level of return.
Having an efficient portfolio when preparing a financial planning is undeniably important as this helps you in your decision-making; whether you engage in something while knowing the specific risk of doing that certain action.
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
Answer:
A. Some customers presented tickets purchased on a previous day when there wasn't a ticket taker at the theater entrance.
Explanation:
The control of selling fresh prenumbered tickets from the last number sold on the previous day is a control that detects tickets sold the previous day.
If tickets were sold on the previous day, they can be reused today. So having a unique number on them is an ideal way to monitor the range of tickets issued today.
Only those within the range will be allowed to enter the theatre.
Answer:
increase in income of $80
Explanation:
Prepare an Analysis of Costs and Savings if the Company buys from Outside Supplier.
Note : The fixed costs per unit at are unavoidable are irrelevant and disregarded in this decision.
<u>Analysis of Costs and Savings</u>
Purchase Price (400 widgets × $44.00) = ($17,600)
Savings :
Variable Costs ($35.60 × 400 widgets) = $14,240
Fixed Cost ( $8.60 × 400 widgets) = $3,440
Net Income effect = $80
Conclusion :
The effect on net income if the company instead buys the widgets is an increase in income of $80