Answer:
h > 5
h < 0
Step-by-step explanation:
We suppose that a "Special Solution" inequality is one that is technically incorrect, but is written using a compact "shorthand" form.
As written, the inequality claims that 17 < 2, which is false. There can be no value of the variable that will make this true. We presume the intended meaning is ...
17 < 3h +2 <u>or</u> 3h +2 < 2
<h3>Special solution</h3>
Subtracting 2 from the inequality gives ...
15 < 3h < 0
Dividing by 3 gives ...
5 < h < 0
There is no value of h that is both greater than 5 and less than 0, so we presume this means the OR (union) of the solution sets ...
h > 5
h < 0
The equation can be modeled as
X + X + (X+4) = 61
X is used for all because they are all the same number and can be given the same variable
The third is given plus four so we can use a common variable
3x + 4 = 61
3x = 57 (subtracted four)
x = 19 (divided by three)
Solving for third side so x + 4
The third side is 23 inches
Answer:
The function is not defined for x=2
Step-by-step explanation:
we have
we know that
In a quotient the denominator cannot be equal to zero
so
equate the denominator to zero to find the value of x
solve for x
therefore
The function is not defined for x=2
