Answer:
The correct answer is 3/8
Step-by-step explanation:
It was in my practice and I had gotten it correct.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Yes!
If the traversal is perpendicular to the parallel lines.
Answer:
A) None
Step-by-step explanation:
1) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst, for example, if s = 3, t = 4, and n = 12, then both s and t are factors of n, but 
is not a factor of nst = 144.
2) 
shoudnt neccesarily be a factor of nst. Let s be 4, let t be 6, and let n be 12. Then n is a factor of both s and t, but 
is not a factor of nst = 12*24. In fact, it is a greater number.
3) Again, s+t isnt necessarily a factor of nst, let s be 2 and t be 3. Then both s and t are factor of n = 12. However 5 = s+t is not a factor of nst = 72.
So, neither of the three options is guaranteed to be a factor of nst. In fact, for s = 4, t = 6, and n = 12, none of the three options are valid.
The answer to this question is 2197! Hope this helped :3
16,000 is your answer :)
look next to the 6. Since it is less than 5, you do nothing to the 16 part and turn the rest to 0's.
