Answer: The appropriate motion for either of the parties to file is MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT.
Explanation: Motion for summary judgement is a request made that begs a court to determine a case that no factual issue are in dispute and that the case is to be decided in favor of one party or the other based on the legal issues surrounding the case. This judgement involves a court ruling a case on at least one claim.
In this question, since both are in agreement as to what happened during the accident, summary judgement will be made on their interpretation of the state law affecting who had the right of way when they collided.
The geosphere is the Earth itself the rocks minerals, and landforms of the surfaces and interior.
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
