Answer:
there is no difference in the length of the prison sentence received by attractive and unattractive defendants.
Explanation:
Null hypothesis is a form of hypothesis that describes a form.of hypothesis in which there is no statistical significance between the two variables in the hypothesis.
In other words, it is a form of hypothesis that assumes that there is no relationship between the variables being considered.
Hence, in this case, the null hypothesis would suggest that there is no significant difference between specified populations, any observed difference being due to sampling or experimental error.
Answer:
Plessy v. Ferguson
Explanation:
The Plessy v. Ferguson case happened in 1896. The decision from this case effectively started the Racial Segregation in United States. During the segregation, the government separated the public infrastructures into two: Those who can be used by white citizens only and those who can be used by black citizens only. This infrastructures cover all facilities ranging from Schools, Public Transportation, public bathrooms, etc.
But, the facilities provided for the Black citizens tend to be lower in quality compared to the facilities provided for white citizens. This led to a deeper problem for the Black community. For example, Due to the low quality of schools for black citizens, they produce a generation of graduates who has lesser chance to obtain high paying jobs. This prevented the black community to advance in society.
The correct answer is Gettysburg
Explanation:
The battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest of the United States Civil War. In addition to more than 8,000 deaths, the Pennsylvania hill strike is considered a turning point in the US civil conflict (1861-1865).
The episode marks the beginning of the offensive of the Union's northern troops: a decisive victory for General George Meade - and a disastrous feat for the prominent Strategic General Robert Lee, military leader of the Confederacy (South).
In health and social care, as a practicioner you're usually required to not disclose any information about your client openly to other people.
The only exemption here is when doing an super- or intervision with your peers, here you can "breach" this confidentiality with obviously still presenting this person as an anonymous case.
Another exemption is when you're given information that revolves around possible hurting other people or self-hurting coming from the client itself.
Conditioned response is the any
Sorry if I'm wrong
