Answer:
Answer 1.
Beneath referenced pointers show that organization arranged the liquidation for recent years or something like that.
- The way that there had been no interest in R&D for recent years which more likely than not brought about noteworthy cost putting something aside for the organization.
- BBB bought expanded size of stock on layaway from providers in recent years which is a warning.
- Indeed, even without bringing about any R&D cost for recent years, CFO of BBB moved toward the bank to expand the credit line of the organization and utilized all credit line without legitimate desk work.
- CFO erroneously guaranteed the brokers about new product offering so as to look for advances/increment credit line.
- Indeed, even with diminished deals, organization was indicating lower supply of stock. They more likely than not been offering the stock at cost to outsider or shrouded it at an undisclosed area to dupe the providers.
- With no interest in R&D and declining business possibilities, organization couldn't have given new offers for subsidizing
Answer 2.
Yes, even if it is a fraudulent filing for bankruptcy, BBB organization despite everything can select to petition for financial protection or BBB can close the business through and through and escape with the reserve funds and continues from the offer of the stock. Indeed, even leasers and providers reserve the option to petition for automatic insolvency against the BBB in the event that BBB doesn't seek financial protection.
It thoroughly relies upon the BBB Company, in the event that it selects to declare financial insolvency under section 7, or 11 of the liquidation code. Be that as it may, it is just under section 11 liquidation procedures of the chapter 11 court it very well may be set up that BBB's aim and untrustworthy strategic policies establishes to insolvency misrepresentation.
d. by dividing the total estimated manufacturing overhead costs by the total estimated amount of the allocation base
Answer: D. Both countries
Explanation:
The options include:
A. neither country
B. the country with lower production costs
C. the country with higher production costs
D. both countries
Comparative advantage occurs when a particular country produces a certain goods based on the fact that it has a lower opportunity cost of its production when compared to the other country. This typically occurs in international trade.
Comparative advantage is beneficial to both countries that are involved as the countries purchase the goods that it doesn't have a comparative advantage in from the other country.
<span>There is a binding contract as soon and Patrick and Britt orally agree. There does no need to be a written contract as long as there is a meeting of the minds.</span>
Answer:
$27,175
Explanation:
Year 1
Sales $62,500
Depreciation $8,000
Operating Cost $25,000
Total Expense <u>($33,000)</u>
Income Before tax $29,500
Tax 35% <u>($10,325)</u>
Net Income <u>$19,175</u>
Interest Expense is not relevant to the project, It is a financing decision which will not be part of project calculation.
As the Net income includes the deduction of non cash item of depreciation. so, it will be added back to calculate the cash flow.
Cash Flow in year 1 = Net Income + Depreciation = $19,175 + $8,000 = $27,175
