This is a subtraction expression.o evaluate, substitute 29 for the variable in the expression.to<span>evaluate the expression, subtract 31 from 29.</span>
Irrational numbers cannot be classified as rational numbers. - EXPLANATION - both are different completely, according to as I think, and thus they cannot be inter-related. Irrational like - root2, root3, and all those that cannot be further solved completely. Their decimal representation is neither recurring nor ending e.g. 1.101001000100001000001.... and so on while rational number are consisting of whole numbers, integers, natural numbers, and all the constants and their decimal representation can be non ending but recurring.
5. d. Irrational numbers cannot be classified as rational numbers. - EXPLANATION - out of the options this one's correct. As I above said, all numbers as far as I know can be categorized into unreal and real numbers out of which real numbers consist of irrational and rational numbers while unreal numbers, I don't know as I have not been taught about them yet and neither do you have been, as I think so. All I know is that, as far as I have been taught, unreal number are not connected to real numbers.
6. Every real number is a rational number. - EXPLANATION - As I told you above, real numbers can also be irrational so this is false.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
I was thinking about it and I prepared my paper and pen and started typing the problem but then I realized this...
<u>8</u><u>+</u><u> </u> and <u>8</u><u>-</u>
Then I was like
OK....
I think that is D cus you take 10 off
Answer: B Linear
Step-by-step explanation:
It wouldn't be exponential because there isn't exponent, and it won't be rational because there is no fraction, and it is not quadratic. Hope this helps :)
