<span>. Africa was controlled by European nations the french controlled much of west and central Africa the British controlled much of the south Africa and large portions of east Africa the Belgians controlled the Congo </span>
Answer:
Too much authority and power in the hands of state governments
It is absolutely ethical to charge those with lower incomes less money, and those with higher incomes more money.
Answer:
The U.S. government made reservations the centerpiece of Indian policy around 1850, and thereafter reserves became a major bone of contention between natives and non-natives in the Pacific Northwest. However, they did not define the lives of all Indians. Many natives lived off of reservations, for example. One estimate for 1900 is that more than half of all Puget Sound Indians lived away from reservations. Many of these natives were part of families that included non-Indians and children of mixed parentage, and most worked as laborers in the non-Indian economy. They were joined by Indians who migrated seasonally away from reservations, and also from as far away as British Columbia. As Alexandra Harmon's article "Lines in Sand" makes clear, the boundaries between "Indian" and "non-Indian," and between different native groups, were fluid and difficult to fix. Reservations could not bound all Northwest Indians any more than others kinds of borders and lines could.
Answer:
widespread ethnic conflict, lack of national identity
Explanation:
A lot of effect can be derived from the Europeans creation of colonial boundaries. Because the boundaries were artificially made, they by and large do not conform to “typical demographic, topographic and ethnographic boundaries.” Instead, they were created by colonialists who saw the act as a means to advance their political goals.
This metamorphosed into large scale issues, like the separation of ethnic groups; and other small scale issues, like families’ homes being alienated from their farms.
