1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lara31 [8.8K]
3 years ago
10

PLEASE HELP!!!! I'M STUCK ON THIS

History
1 answer:
vitfil [10]3 years ago
3 0
It's not like any of these groups did nothing, and these groups were all underrepresented in this era, but I get why ur history teacher is making u do this. I would say African Americans, then women, then Native Americans. I don't know what ur history teacher included in the lesson, but here r my reasons. African Americans served in the army because they thought fighting for American Independence would give them freedom. look up names of specific soldiers.
2. Women. Look up Abigail Adams, Martha Curtis Washington, and others. White women were included better than Native Americans, so I put them second.
3. I know many Native Americans served on the American side, but I'm putting them third because they had a lot to lose, and I recall that many served on the side of the English.
That's all I remember from history class. Hopefully that's enough to get u started.
You might be interested in
In the post-World War Il period, which issue is most closely associated with the boundaries created by Europeans for newly
densk [106]
If you look at the map of Africa, many borders are straight lines. (compare it to the borders in Europe, for example). However, Africa was not an empty land, but full of cultures and ethnic groups, and those groups were split when the straight lines were drawn and some groups hostile to each other were put in the same country. This created ethnic tensions
7 0
3 years ago
Why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into Poland? Why were the tracks leading to Birkenau never bombed? I have put t
anyanavicka [17]

Answer:

Historically, the primary reason the lines leading to Birkenau were never attacked was due to a lack of political resolve to do so, and not because bombing operations were unimportant. When the gas chambers were operational in 1941, the majority of the concentration camps were located out from the range of Allied bombers and German air defenses.

The Allied Forces knew about the detention camps by June 1944, and the German air defenses were on the decline. Bomber efficiency is improving. The railroads were still intact. Every day, thousands of Jewish are processed in these centers.

Historians agree that the Nazis would still murder the Jews even without the concentration camps. The mobile death squads were among the most prolific extermination organizations of the Nazis. Even though the bombs wouldn't halt the murders, the Allied focused on the bombings of military camps and industrial areas in order to undermine Germany's war operations.

Explanation:

Railways were an important component of the Holocaust and Nazi activities. Information on the camps was only accessible after the war had ended. They felt that the costs would exceed the advantages of bombing the railroads. Millions of Jews had already been gassed.

Had the Allied Forces simply bombed the railroads once they had the intelligence, many lives might have been spared. They only needed political will and a commitment to social duty, regardless of the personal dangers, in order to put a stop to the camps' deadly activities.

Soviet forces were the major Allied soldiers in the Eastern Front, where they committed genocide of their own people. Stalin also has anti-Semitic inclinations. We may be certain that he didn't bomb the railroads and let the Germans continue to use the extermination camps.

Hope this helps, if so would you mind saying thanks?

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The balfour declaration and the british mandate both relate to which event?
tamaranim1 [39]

the awnswer is the 4th one

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were Some Northern Workers reasons for being against or for slavery?
Advocard [28]

Answer: The North wanted to block the spread of slavery. They were also concerned that an extra slave state would give the South a political advantage. The South thought new states should be free to allow slavery if they wanted. as furious they did not want slavery to spread and the North to have an advantage in the US senate.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why would Buddhism appeal to the laborers and craftspeople? (answer quick plz)
viktelen [127]

Answer:

because Buddha rejected the Caste System (laborers/crafts people = bottom). - no longer slave like people because of social order

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain the primary reason that Lincoln won the election of 1860
    13·1 answer
  • What did Europeans want from a trade relationship with the east?
    8·2 answers
  • In which region are the Gobeklitepe located
    15·1 answer
  • How did plessy v. ferguson affect race relations in the south and north?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain why black leaders were under more pressure to work together than white politicians were.
    5·1 answer
  • Why did King Philip II see the French Huguenots as a menace
    6·1 answer
  • Aol, llc, mistakenly made public the personal information of 650,000 of its members. the members filed a suit in california, all
    12·1 answer
  • The golden age of Islamic society preserved Greek and Spartan culture<br> -True<br> -False
    5·2 answers
  • What needs to happen after the energy is produced?
    14·1 answer
  • 4) What does veneration of ancestors mean?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!