A, because that is the basis for the concept of risk pooling.
D is the correct answer
As explanation: A Supreme Court justice is appointed for life. This means that their rulings are not bound to traditional elected politics in the way that elected judges are responsible to voters. Judges agree to the doctrine of stare decisis, which refers to letting the decision stand or following precedent. This enables a smooth continuity when it comes to American law and ensures that modern law is based on small clarifications instead of wild and unpredictable shifts.
Explanation:
Social participation is defined as a person's involvement in activities that provide interaction with others in the society or the community and expresses interpersonal interactions outside the home. ... Political social participation involves making decisions on social groups and allocating resources.
Social participation provides emotional support, laughter, and levity. Participating in social activities makes you feel as if you matter to a community which provides a sense of meaning and belonging. Social activities help relieve the angst of perceived social isolation.
The correct answer is one's language determines the pattern of one's thinking and view of the world.
The principle of linguistic relativity postulates that the way in which a language is structured affects the cognition of its speakers - which directs, inhibits and shapes their worldview. It is also known as the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is commonly divided into two versions: one more extreme and one less extreme; or it can be understood as being part of a spectrum. I prefer to think of it as a spectrum.
At one end of the spectrum, the theory states that language determines cognition. It is also known as linguistic determinism. Linguistic determinism proposes that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories - in other words, the way we think is a product of the language we speak, and our language can allow or prevent us from thinking in certain ways. At the other end of the spectrum, the theory holds that language only influences cognition, but does not determine it - so the way we think is guided by our language, but we are able to think in ways that are not always determined by our native language .
