Answer: The party responsible for covering Jack's medical bills is his EMPLOYER.
Explanation: Under business law, which is the law which governs business and commerce, Jack attending a meeting at a restaurant to discuss his annual performance evaluation can be termed as official office hours. In this case, whatever happens to Jack as a result of working during working hours is a responsibility of his employer.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
Evidences that have been analyzed in violation to the right of a defendant can't be used or presented in the court of law, just like the option states ,it has violated the rights and according to the law should not be used in presenting a case to the judge , so option B best explains what the exclusionary rules states.
To the person above that’s kinda mean u know
It is the decision of the Supreme Court complex ruling in O'Connor v. Ortega. This case delineated two sectors in the workplace: public and private. Within the private sector, the Supreme Courts stated, "Every warrantless workplace search must be evaluated carefully on its facts. In the public sector, however, as established in the O'Connor case, public agencies may have compelling reasons to search in the workplace.
