The mAngleVSR m Angle VSR is mathematically given as
= 80°
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is mAngleVSR?</h3>
Generally, Draw two lines: one that connects the points R, S, and U, and another that connects the points V, S, and T. (see attached diagram). At point S, these lines come together to create four angles, which are denoted by the letters RSV, VSU, UST, and TSR respectively.
The angles VSU and RST are both considered to be vertical angles, as are the angles RSV and UST. Vertical angles are equivalent, therefore
m∠VSU = m∠RST = 100°
m∠RSV = m∠UST
In conclusion, Angles RSV and VSU are considered supplementary angles since their sum is equal to 180 degrees. Som
m∠RSV = 180° - m∠VSU =180° - 100° = 80°
Angle RSV is the same as angle VSR (the name of the angle may be read either from the right to the left or from the left to the right).
Read more about angles
brainly.com/question/17039091
#SPJ1
Answer:00.24
explanation:
Just add the decimal form and multiply the 240 with the decimal of the 3/4
Answer:
The equation does not have a real root in the interval ![\rm [0,1]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B0%2C1%5D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We can make use of the intermediate value theorem.
The theorem states that if 
is a continuous function whose domain is the interval [a, b], then it takes on any value between f(a) and f(b) at some point within the interval. There are two corollaries:
- If a continuous function has values of opposite sign inside an interval, then it has a root in that interval. This is also known as Bolzano's theorem.
- The image of a continuous function over an interval is itself an interval.
Of course, in our case, we will make use of the first one.
First, we need to proof that our function is continues in , which it is since every polynomial is a continuous function on the entire line of real numbers. Then, we can apply the first corollary to the interval , which means to evaluate the equation in 0 and 1:
Since both values have the same sign, positive in this case, we can say that by virtue of the first corollary of the intermediate value theorem the equation does not have a real root in the interval . I attached a plot of the equation in the interval ![\rm [-2,2]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Crm%20%5B-2%2C2%5D)
where you can clearly observe how the graph does not cross the x-axis in the interval.
Answer:
3 1/4 + 2 1/3 = 67 / 12 = 57 1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Conversion a mixed number to a improper fraction: 3 1/4 = 3 · 4 + 1
4
= 13
4
Conversion a mixed number to a improper fraction: 2 1/3 = 2 · 3 + 1
3
= 7
3
Add: 13
4
+ 7
3
= 13 · 3
4 · 3
+ 7 · 4
3 · 4
= 39
12
+ 28
12
= 39 + 28
12
= 67
12
Answer:
iK ITS A TRICKY QUESTION ITS C THOUGH
Step-by-step explanation:
