The answer would "B"
Hemorrhage is the medical term for significant and potentially life threatening bleeding, which is usually not something particularly common as a sporting injury.
Arthritis is actually prevented by constant sporting activities and is more degeneration as a result of old age.
When we look at the healthcare system,survey data suppose to be
selectively used instead a methodology that is mixed should be followed like most times, gathering feedback face to face or personally and them finding the problems would them be useful.
However,the survey data has options that are limited in number and mostly a rating scale or yes/no. But if the actual issues need to be found out,them you know interviews will be useful,but completely depending on the survey data will totally be biased.
Looking at the cases given, it is clearly stated that there is a problem with the wait time and the nature of the staffs that is unfriendly, however,it is important that clarity could be provided when the details are known.
It all depends on your diet buddy
Answer:
is a blind, neutral experiment
Explanation:
In Science, to have results in which you can trust, always need to be a comparative ( in this case the creatinine supplementation and the other powder). To be a serious experiment, need to have the same activities, duration and the participants need to "blind" to know which substance they are really taking, so they need to train as usual, and after some time the results will show if there is a significant difference.
