All categories

3 years ago

Which expression is equivalent to d – 60 – 3d?

Mathematics

1 answer:

Vanyuwa [196]3 years ago

7 0

Answer:

it would be 2d - 60

Step-by-step explanation:

Because if you susbtract d from 3d it would be 2d cause d is like a number in this unit

You might be interested in

Toby was baby-sitting a baby that weighed 264 ounces. How many pounds did the baby weigh?

Naily [24]

Answer: the baby weighs 16.5 pounds

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Gabriela drew a net of a rectangular prism on

shtirl [24]

Answer:

412 squares

Step-by-step explanation:

16o

140

172

412

trust me on this

5 0

3 years ago

josefina surveyed 298 students and found that 52% like scary movies . estimate the number of students that like scary movies .

Inessa [10]

It would be: 298*52 / 100 = 154.96

Approx. 155 students like scary movies

8 0

3 years ago

A salesperson makes a commission of 1% of all cars that he sells. If his goal is to make at least $4,285 worth of commission dur

shusha [124]

Answer: $428,500

Step-by-step explanation:

Since commission is 1% = 1/100

Let the missing amount be represented as p

From the question, 1/100 × p = 4285

1/100p = 4285

Divide both sides by 1/100 to get the value of p

p = $4285 ÷ 1/100

p= $4285 × 100/1

p = $428500; i hope this helps, please mark as brainliest answer.

6 0

3 years ago

Let X1,X2......X7 denote a random sample from a population having mean μ and variance σ. Consider the following estimators of μ:

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

a) In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

b) For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we assume that we have a random sample given by: $X_1, X_2,....,X_7$ and each $X_i \sim N (\mu, \sigma)$

Part a

In order to check if an estimator is unbiased we need to check this condition:

$E(\theta) = \mu$

And we can find the expected value of each estimator like this:

$E(\theta_1 ) = \frac{1}{7} E(X_1 +X_2 +... +X_7) = \frac{1}{7} [E(X_1) +E(X_2) +....+E(X_7)]= \frac{1}{7} 7\mu= \mu$

So then we conclude that $\theta_1$ is unbiased.

For the second estimator we have this:

$E(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{2} [2E(X_1) -E(X_3) +E(X_5)]=\frac{1}{2} [2\mu -\mu +\mu] = \frac{1}{2} [2\mu]= \mu$

And then we conclude that $\theta_2$ is unbiaed too.

Part b

For this case first we need to find the variance of each estimator:

$Var(\theta_1) = \frac{1}{49} (Var(X_1) +...+Var(X_7))= \frac{1}{49} (7\sigma^2) = \frac{\sigma^2}{7}$

And for the second estimator we have this:

$Var(\theta_2) = \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2 -\sigma^2 +\sigma^2)= \frac{1}{4} (4\sigma^2)= \sigma^2$

And the relative efficiency is given by:

$RE= \frac{Var(\theta_1)}{Var(\theta_2)}=\frac{\frac{\sigma^2}{7}}{\sigma^2}= \frac{1}{7}$

5 0

4 years ago