Hello. You didn't talk about what story this character belongs to, which makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I can help by telling you the deficition of a complex character. This will help you to recognize characteristics in this character that will lead you to be able to answer the question.
A complex character is one that in a credible and concrete way, manages to show himself as an individual with many layers who have different depths and complexities, leading this character to be a complex person, with several different traits, and may even seem contradictory, enigmatic and unpredictable. This character must reflect aspects inherent to human nature, difficult to understand and which require the use of the reader's reasoning and interpretation throughout the plot so that the character's actions are surprising and move reading.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Who and whose (which is wrong for a couple of reasons) refer to people. So neither of those 2 can be the answer.
Which and that are all that is left.
The usage is very close. Which, I think, is the correct answer. It usually begins a clause that adds more information to the noun (usually) that it modifies. In this case, the clause modifies mammal and tells it that is unique in that it can fly.
That is normally a pronoun that oddly modifies again usually a specific noun. You are not talking about a bat that lives in your back yard and that you have named. Bats in general are the only mammals that fly.
I still would use which.
<h2>Answer:</h2><h2>As the Civil War came to a close, southern states began to pass a series of discriminatory state laws collectively known as black codes. While the laws varied in both content and severity from state to state—some laws actually granted freed people the right to marry or testify in court— these codes were designed to maintain the social and economic structure of racial slavery in the absence of the “peculiar institution.” The laws codified white supremacy by restricting the civic participation of freed people; the codes deprived them of the right to vote, the right to serve on juries, the right to own or carry weapons, and, in some cases, even the right to rent or lease land.</h2><h2>Slavery had been a pillar of economic stability in the region before the war; now, black codes ensured the same stability by recreating the antebellum economic structure under the façade of a free-labor system. Adhering to new “apprenticeship” laws determined within the black codes, judges bound many young African American orphans to white plantation owners who would then force them to work. Adult freedmen were forced to sign contracts with their employers—who were oftentimes their previous owners. These contracts prevented African Americans from working for more than one employer, and therefore, from positively influencing the very low wages or poor working conditions they received.</h2><h2>Any former slaves that attempted to violate or evade these contracts were fined, beaten, or arrested for vagrancy. Upon arrest, many “free” African Americans were made to work for no wages, essentially being reduced to the very definition of a slave. Although slavery had been outlawed by the Thirteenth Amendment, it effectively continued in many southern states..!!</h2>
