The answer is C, New experiments can affect previous scientific explanations. Please mark BRAINLIEST.
Explanation:
Since the scientist did the experiment before and decided that they could not make new neurons yet later tested that that was wrong and that female songbirds can produce new neurons, that fact therefore, disproved his theory previously. It affected the theory he had before, not after, not before.
The correct answer is C. New experiments can affect previous scientific explanations.
Explanation: An experiment is a way of checking a phenomenon under specific conditions to analyze its effects or to verify a hypothesis. An example of this is the statement because before the seventies it was believed that new neurons could not be generated in an adult brain, however, after conducting an experiment on songbirds it was found that it was possible. Therefore, it confirms that new experiments can affect previous scientific explanations because new experiments can test hypotheses that modify previous explanations. So the correct answer is C. New experiments can affect previous scientific explanations.
In the capillaries, hydrostatic
pressure (HP) is exerted by blood that is often
measured for diagnosis since it is closely related to the force and rate of the
heartbeat and the diameter and elasticity of the arterial walls. The net hydrostatic pressure (HP) is the
hydrostatic pressure in the capillary minus hydrostatic pressure in the interstitial
fluid.
Contact inhibition is a process of arresting cell growth when cells come in contact with each other. As a result, normal cells stop proliferating when they form a monolayer in a culture dish. Contact inhibition is a powerful anticancer mechanism that is lost in cancer cells (16).
<h3>the best estimate for earth age is based on radiometric dating of fragment from the canyon dialo iron meteorite from the fragments scientist calculated the relative abundance of element that's for maid as radioactive Uranium decayed over billion of years</h3>