ANSWER ASAP GIVING BRAINLIEST FIVE STARS AND HEART!

History

2 answers:

emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Checks and balances: The system of checks and balances in government was developed to ensure that no one branch of government would become too powerful. The framers of the U.S. Constitution built a system that divides power between the three branches of the U.S. government—legislative, executive and judicial—and includes various limits and controls on the powers of each branch.

Separation of powers: The system of separation of powers divides the tasks of the state into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. These tasks are assigned to different institutions in such a way that each of them can check the others. As a result, no one institution can become so powerful in a democracy as to destroy this system.

velikii [3]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

to limit any one branch from excersizeing the core functions of another. to prevent the concentration of power. to provide checks and balances. to depend on the power of each other.

You might be interested in

Which statement best describes why the Mormons left Illinois?

natali 33 [55]

Answer: C

Explanation: Mormons had always gotten harassed for their religon so they sought to find a place somewhat secluded.

4 0

3 years ago

Give an example of a demigod..

forsale [732]

An example of a demigod can be:

Hanuman, Nandi, Garuda, Achilles, Aneas, Bacchus, Hercules, Perseus, Atalanta, etc

hope this helps

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did natives die so easily from European diseases?

leonid [27]

They haven't been vaccinated against diseases that are common in Europe or their bodies aren't adapted to European lifestyles

6 0

4 years ago

Select that all apply: Functions of state committees include which of the following

liq [111]

Organizing and managing campaigns for state offices<span>
assisting in local campaigns
</span>
organizing state conventions<span>
raising money</span>

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How was the calling of the Estates-General similar or different to the calling of Parliament by King Charles l of England?

jeyben [28]

Ans: The calling of the Estates-General is different from the calling of Parliament by King Charles I of England in that the calling of the Estates-General in times of French King Louis XIV did not limit his powers of King, while in the case of the calling of Parliament by King Charles I of England, the Parliament indeed limited the powers of the monarch.
After King Philip XIV called for the Estates-General, the state was set to bring the French Revolution to a beginning. Indeed, Philip was the last monarch before the Revolution. Let's remember that he finished his days as a king when he died in the guillotine in 1793. In the case of King Charles I, he was tried and accused of high treason to England. He was executed in 1649.

5 0

3 years ago