PLEASE HELP! this stuff is.. horrible.

Write an equation for the table 2 5 5.6 14 7 17.5 8 20

vova2212 [387]

The equation for the table is y = 2.5 x

Step-by-step explanation:

The table is:

x → 2 : 5.6 : 7 : 8
y → 5 : 14 : 17.5 : 20

Lets check if the table represents the linear relation by find the ratio between the change of each two consecutive y-coordinates and the change of their corresponding x-coordinates

∵ $\frac{14-5}{5.6-2}=\frac{9}{3.6}=2.5$

∵ $\frac{17.5-14}{7-5.6}=\frac{3.5}{1.4}=2.5$

∵ $\frac{20-17.5}{8-7}=\frac{2.5}{1}=2.5$

∴ The rate of change between each two points is constant

∴ The table represent a linear equation

The form of linear equation is y = m x + b, where m is the rate of change and b is value y when x = 0

∵ m = 2.5

- Substitute it in the form of the equation

∴ y = 2.5 x + b

- To find b substitute x and y by the coordinates of any point

in the table above

∵ x = 2 and y = 5

∴ 5 = 2.5(2) + b

∴ 5 = 5 + b

- Subtract 5 from both sides

∴ 0 = b

∴ y = 2.5 x

The equation for the table is y = 2.5 x

Learn more:

You can learn more about the linear equations in brainly.com/question/4326955

#LearnwithBrainly

5 0

3 years ago

In 7 minutes, Jenny can type 63 words. What is her rate in words per minute?

NISA [10]

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Many companies use well-known celebrities as spokespersons in their TV advertisements. A study was conducted to determine whethe

s2008m [1.1K]

Answer:

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (P-value = 0.01537).

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete: the picture attached gives the missing sample data.

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim that is going to be stated in the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent. This means that the proportions differ significantly.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis can be written as:

$H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0$

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample 1 (Male celebrity), of size n1=150 has a proportion of p1=0.273.

$p_1=X_1/n_1=41/150=0.273$

The sample 2 (Female celebrity), of size n2=150 has a proportion of p2=0.407.

$p_2=X_2/n_2=61/150=0.407$

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.133.

$p_d=p_1-p_2=0.273-0.407=-0.133$

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

$p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{41+61.05}{150+150}=\dfrac{102}{300}=0.34$

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

$s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}+\dfrac{0.34*0.66}{150}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.001496+0.001496}=\sqrt{0.002992}=0.055$

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

$z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.133-0}{0.055}=\dfrac{-0.133}{0.055}=-2.44$

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

$P-value=2\cdot P(z$

As the P-value (0.01537) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of brand awareness of female TV viewers and the gender of the spokesperson are not independent (the proportions differ).

6 0

3 years ago

Evan dove a depth of 58 feet below sea level then he swam 23 feet closer to shore is the depth now positive or negative

Mariulka [41]

The depth is still negative

6 0

3 years ago

What is 33 1/3 of 687

natita [175]

The answer would be:
23014 1/2

explanation:

the word of automatically indicated multiplication. replacing the expression with of gives you
33 1/3x687

that is then simplified to: 23014 1/2

5 0

3 years ago

PLEASE HELP!this stuff is.. horrible.​

PLEASE HELP!this stuff is.. horrible.