All categories

3 years ago

Explain why abstract words and concepts like prejudice and equality are more likely to be

1 answer:

7 0

Abstract words and concepts are more likely to be confused than concrete words because often times, their meanings are more vague and expansive. Words like prejudice and equality have many smaller subtopics underneath them, making it harder to know what the speaker / writer means when they are using those very abstract words. Concrete words are more effective for a direct answer to the listener / reader because they have more straightforward meanings. There is no deliberation as to what is implied with the use of a concrete word, because really only has one main connotation. People have a more united understanding on concrete words than they do on abstract ones.

You might be interested in

PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! The argument between conservationists and preservationists continues today. Remember that conservationists wa

Luden [163]

Answer: The answer is you can neither be fully supportive of the either. In fact the battle will go on or you may the arguments will perhaps get louder in the years to come.

Explanation: None of the nations wants to back from using a lucrative resources that they chance upon fully knowing the repercussions of climate change and various other damaging havoc that can impact the entire earth.

The greed in humans cannot be killed and perhaps we already are paying a heavy price for it. The conservationists believe the usage of the resources should be done in a responsible manner.

The supply need not be jeopardised for the future generations but no objections in continuing to use them though. Sustainability is the argument that they propound.

The preservationists are purists in the true sense they don't want to disturb mother nature and allow them to flourish in their pristine form and we continue to live in harmony with that.

The intrinsic value of the land and other resources have to retained and gained inspiration for its beauty and serenity. It is the theory that preservationists have stuck too for years.

Each is right in their own way, if we don't use the natural resources we won't be able to function as well as we do.

If we don't preserve some of the natural resources and stick our head into every resource on the surface of the earth, there will be large destruction and extinction of flora and fauna.

Hence it would be right to say, that we need to rethink what we are going to do because in the next few years what we do will determine our future and there is no going back then.

6 0

3 years ago

Multiple Choice

kramer

1. size

2. original source; point of origin

3. Chocolate milk, chocolate fudge, ice cream, and candy.

4. Kelley studies the effects of the chemicals in chocolate.

5. They require very little natural light.

6. Too much light will actually harm the plants.

7. During the 1940s and 1950s, Budd Abbott and Lou Costello were a popular comedy team on radio, television, and stage.

8. were called

9. Even on weekends, holidays, and vacations.*

6 0

3 years ago

Who is impressed by Curley’s Wife’s beauty and is caught staring at her?

valina [46]

Who is impressed by Curley's wife's beauty and caught staring at her?

George Lennie Slim Carlson

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which statement is true about falling action in a story?

anastassius [24]

The answer should be B) It reveals the characters' actions in response to the climax.

8 0

3 years ago

Paragraph Five

Simora [160]

Answer:

B. These areas are necessary for a successful life.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers