All categories

3 years ago

Factor completely, I NEED HELP 4x^3 + 7x^2 +4x + 7

Mathematics

2 answers:

emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago

4 0

(4x+7) (x^2+1) is it factored

ArbitrLikvidat [17]3 years ago

3 0

The common factor is x ^ 3

So that gives you x ^ 3 = (4+ 7 / x + 4 / x ^ 2 + 7 / x ^ 3)

Because we therefore simplify x ^ 3 = (4 + (7x ^ 2 / x ^ 3) + (4x / x ^ 3) + 7 / x ^ 3)

You might be interested in

Michelle tried to solve an equation step by step. \begin{aligned} t-\dfrac35&=\dfrac45\\\\ t-\dfrac35+\dfrac35&=\dfrac45

koban [17]

Answer:

Step 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Michelle's step in trying to solve the equation is given below:

$\begin{aligned} t-\dfrac35&=\dfrac45\\\\ t-\dfrac35+\dfrac35&=\dfrac45+\dfrac35&\green{\text{Step } 1}\\\\ t&=1&\blue{\text{Step } 2} \end{aligned}$

Michelle made a mistake in Step 2.

The right hand side of Step 1: $\dfrac45+\dfrac35\neq 1$

Rather, the correct sum is:

$\dfrac45+\dfrac35=\dfrac75\\\\=1\dfrac25$

4 0

4 years ago

Units. Find the other

Tcecarenko [31]

Answer:

L = 12

Step-by-step explanation:

I didn't really know how to do it I just looked it up lol

6 0

3 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

8 0

3 years ago

Need help on finding the area!

Inessa05 [86]

FOLLOW ME FOR CLEARING YOUR NEXT DOUBT

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Add the two expressions.<br><br> 2x + 6 and 6x −1<br><br> Enter your answer in the box.

MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

8x +5

Step-by-step explanation:

The sum is found by combining "like" terms—those that have the same arrangement of variables.

The first expression, 2x +6, has terms 2x and 6.

The second expression, 6x -1, has terms 6x and -1.

In each case, the first term listed is first-degree in the variable x. These are "like" terms, so can be added:

... 2x +6x = (2+6)x = 8x

The second term listed in each case is a constant. These are "like" terms, so can be added:

... 6 + (-1) = 5

Then the sum of the given expressions is the sum of the results from adding like terms:

... 8x + 5

4 0

3 years ago