1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRINA_888 [86]
3 years ago
14

Final Draft

History
2 answers:
Mama L [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Despite administering the Executive Order 9066 to Japanese, it was, ironically, condemned almost 70 percent of imprisoned Japanese but American Citizens. It was supposed to be the first blow of the US to the Japanese after declaring war and it resulted to incarceration of 120,000 Japanese. They were brought in wartime camps and suspend the their rights under Fifth Amendment.

It's the seventh of December, 1941, and a Japanese family sits at the table for dinner. Little do they know however, these following dinners will be their last meals together. In the coming days, the American government will execute Order 9066 act at the order of President Franklin Roosevelt, authorizing all evacuation of persons of Japanese descent. However many people believe Roosevelt's actions to be warranted in the name of public safety, and the sacrifice of those in camps is justified by the risk of just one of them being against the American people.

People who believe this will often state Roosevelt was justified because after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, the fear, hatred and outrage against the Japanese Americans grew and it was a common belief that the Japanese Americans had helped them to plan the attack. They also mention Roosevelt was justified because Article Two grants him authority to issue executive order.

Despite those beliefs, Roosevelt was objectively wrong in his activation of executive order 9066. Addressing the first claim, while it was true many Americans were fearful of the Japanese, they did not only intern the Japanese, but rather they also interned thousands of german and Italian Americans. So although they were fearful of the Japanese, fear was clearly not the only reason they interned innocent American civilians.

Concerning the second point, Roosevelt was technically justified because Article Two grants him authority to issue executive order, however it can also be considered as unjustified because he doubted the intentions of millions of people who were American citizens. They were suspected because of their  ancestry.

while at first, the impulsive mind might believe that Roosevelt was justified in interning millions of Americans, however that is clearly not the case. Order 9066 was a cruel unjustified order that ruined many Americans lives and separated them from their family.

Explanation:

Lilit [14]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066? No, he was not. All it did was result in the internment of Japanese American citizens, even though that wasn't what was specified in the order. Roosevelt was not justified in making this decision because it led to splitting up families, arresting innocent people, and denying their rights.

     The Executive Order 9066 authorized the military to keep out “any or all persons from areas of the United States designated as military areas.” However, the order did not identify any particular group, but Roosevelt used it to remove and imprison Japanese and Japanese-American citizens. It ended up condemning almost 70% of imprisoned Japanese-American Citizens. Even if they were American but had some sort of Japanese descent, they would incarcerate them. All of this was okay because of the Executive Order 9066.

     Where did these innocent citizens go when they were removed and imprisoned? They were brought into wartime camps and were suspended of their rights under Fifth Amendment. The order Roosevelt passes, allowed the suspension and so, the Japanese Americans were denied their rights. The Fifth Amendment states that 'no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process.' This is a world-wide known right. Yet, Roosevelt just takes it away because he simply feels he needs to? That's scary knowing that the president could take everybody's rights away in a second if they wanted to. Not is it only scary, but it is not justified.  

     However, many people believe that Roosevelt was under good reasoning when passing the order. Some people will argue it helped public safety. People who are on that side of this argument tend to believe that he was also justified because of the hatred and fear against the Japanese Americans after the Japanese had attacked Pearl Harbor. This theory continued to expand, leading to a common belief that the Japanese-Americans had been of help to the Japanese in planning the attack.  

     Despite those beliefs, Roosevelt was impartially wrong in his ordering of Executive Order 9066. While it may have been true that many Americans were fearful of the Japanese, this is not a reason of why Roosevelt was justified. This is because they did not only intern Japanese and Japanese-Americans. They also interned thousands of others including Italian and German-Americans. So, even though people were supposedly scared of the Japanese, fear was obviously not the only reason they interned innocent American citizens.

     It's understandable how, on impulse, people can believe that Roosevelt was justified in interning millions of Americans. But, if you look deeper into it, that is clearly not the case. Executive Order 9066 was an inhumane and unjustified order that ruined many Americans lives and tore apart thousands of families. So, in conclusion, Roosevelt was not justified in issuing Executive Order 9066.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Choose one of the following names and write a well-developed paragraph about one of these person's role in the American Revoluti
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:

3. Friedrich Von Stueben

Explanation:

During the early stages of the revolution, the Continental Army had a reputation for being disorganized, undisciplined and poorly drilled. That started to change in early 1778, when the extravagantly named Friedrich Wilhelm Ludolf Gerhard Augustin, the Baron von Steuben, arrived to assist the patriots. The Baron was a former Prussian military officer who had once served on the staff of Frederick the Great. Though prone to exaggeration—he wore flashy uniforms and styled himself a lieutenant general even though he had never risen above the rank of captain—he also possessed a keen military mind. Upon arriving at George Washington’s winter encampment at Valley Forge, he introduced new sanitation measures and gave the troops a crash course in 18th century military tactics that included bayonet combat and more effective techniques for firing and reloading muskets.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following countries would have been most likely to join the Warsaw Pact?
Leviafan [203]
<span>An Eastern European communist country

</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the ruler of Ghana profit from the trade routes that met in his empire
DanielleElmas [232]
I think that he did it by collecting toll on all goods entering or leaving ghana
8 0
4 years ago
Who were conservatives in 1815
andrezito [222]

Answer:

The goal of the conservatives at this meeting, led by Prince Klemens von Metternich of Austria, was said to be to reestablish peace and stability in Europe. To accomplish this, a new balance of power had to be established.

Explanation:

7 0
4 years ago
How did the colonies (United States) change after the treaty?
kati45 [8]

Answer:

The Treaty of Paris of 1763 ended the French and Indian War/Seven Years' War between Great Britain and France, as well as their respective allies. In the terms of the treaty, France gave up all its territories in mainland North America, effectively ending any foreign military threat to the British colonies there.

Explanation:

Hope It Helps ya

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5. What was the result of the Korean War?
    14·1 answer
  • In the nineteenth century, Otto von Bismarck, Chancellor of Germany, compared the making of "laws and sausages" because:
    9·1 answer
  • What causes the plates to move
    5·2 answers
  • Who was Moses and what were the Ten Commandments?
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of a labor resource
    7·1 answer
  • Which groups were part of the Iran-Contra scandal?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the relationship between religion and exploration as stated in the text
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the defining characteristics of the Age of Contact era in Texas history? F. Anglo and Span
    14·1 answer
  • European armies were able to conquer nearly all African territory during the
    8·2 answers
  • The graph shows the percentage of Americans living in urban settings from 1790 to 1990 if the trend continues what is the likely
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!