If you are doing this on a computer just use the calculator, it has different settings so you can change it to length, volume, or whatever. Just click on the 3 lines in the top left corner to see the different settings. There are 91.44 centimeters in a yard by the way.
There's no sample answers but i'll list some...
Majority Rule
Voting
Freedom of Religion
Individualism
etc.
Answer:
More than 300,000 people moved to California during the Dust Bowl to start over because of the damage to land caused by the Dust Bowl. Because of the Great Depression, many of the farmers who migrated to the cities to look for work due the Dust Bowl's destruction of their land could not find employment.
Explanation:
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
the social cognitive perspective
Explanation:
Kaitlin is a personality theorist who believes that a person's conscious thoughts in a particular situation are likely to influence his or her goals and behavior. Kaitlin is most likely to agree with the social cognitive perspective on personality.
Social cognitive perspective is the way we think about others plays a major role in how we think, feel, and interact and relate with the world around us.This basically is like saying the way i see a situation or perceive a situation is the way i would act. Kaitlin believes that a person's conscious thoughts in a particular situation are likely to influence his or her goals and behavior is a social cognitive perspective.
The correct answer is C) because they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view.
<em>In the majority opinion, Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. </em>
We are referring to the case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that was decided on February 24, 1969.
In 1965, five students decided to wear black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War and they were suspended by the school for doing that. In the majority opinion, Judge Abe Fortas suggested that the reason the school authorities suspended the students was that they wanted to avoid the discomfort of facing an unpopular view. At the end of the case, the Court decided that the use of armbands as a protest was not a motive to cause any disruption and that the protest was protected by freedom of speech.
