Answer:
a. occupational rankings are roughly the same in all high-income nations.
Explanation:
(Assuming that the blank space is supposed to be a question mark and the rest of the statement would be answer D.)
Occupational Prestige is a way for sociologists to basically rate a persons job based on the belief of how worthy the job is within society. Based on this information and the answers provided within the question, It can be assumed that occupational rankings are roughly the same in all high-income nations.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer: <span>Neurotransmitter Hypothesis of Schizophrenia
or neurochemical hypothesis.
</span>The focus of this theory is that the n<span>eurotransmitter glutamate and their receptors are reduced in </span><span> Schizophrenia cases. Another </span>neurotransmitter involves is dopamine. A <span>Schizophrenic person will have </span>high levels of dopamine in certain parts of their brain, explaining their psychotic symptoms.
1. The Senate Foreign Relations committee is a standing committee that reviews all legislation affecting international relations in the Senate
2. Sub-committee hearings might hear testimony from the Surgeon General or the President of General Electric
3. A bill which has already passed through the whole process and been signed into law is repealed by a Congress with a different political agenda.
Sumerians were known for two inventions:
irrigation, that is bringing water to crops that would otherwise not have access to it
and writing: cuneiform, one of two first writing systems on earth (the other being hieroglyphs).
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
