The correct answer is <u>openness to change</u>.
<u>Explanation:</u>
<u>"Theory of Basic Human Values"</u> was created by the researcher Shalom H. Schwartz. In intercultural research field, Schwartz identifies ten motivationally distinct values and describes the dynamic relations amongst those values. The relationships between distinct values are portrayed in a circular structure. The quadrant includes hedonism, stimulation and self-direction.
<u>Self-direction</u>: It explains how independent a person is in his thought and action.
<u>Stimulation</u>: It deals with how one faces challenges in their life.
Answer:
c A long shovel
Explanation: to dig them up
Answer:
As human activities like driving have pumped carbon dioxide into the air, the oceans have absorbed a large portion of this gas. Richard Feely of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and his colleagues wanted to know what the effects might be on certain ocean animals that are sensitive to the chemistry of the water they live in.
Many mollusks, corals, and single-celled creatures called foraminifera and coccolithophorids use ingredients in seawater to build their shells and other hard parts. Specifically, they pull "carbonate" ions out of the water and make a hard material called "calcium carbonate."
As you might guess from the name, carbon plays an important role in the chemical reactions that allow these animals to make their homes. But, if the amount of carbon dioxide in the seawater increases above a certain level, these conditions lead to a different set of reactions that don't produce carbonate ions. In parts of the ocean that don't have enough carbonate ions, calcium carbonate shells start to dissolve.
Explanation :HOPE THIS HELPS?
Answer:
relying exclusively on schemata in solving problems and making decisions
Explanation:
Critical thinking: The term critical thinking is determined as an individual's tendency to think purposefully, makes a reasoned and goal-directed judgment, that eventually increases the probability of a particular outcome.
An individual who is trying to think critically not only based his or her judgment on the pre-existing schemas rather he or she questions a particular argument and related conclusion.
