Answer:
True
Explanation:
Manipulating emotion is often very effective to influence consumers' behavior through ads. People tend to be more likely to purchase a certain product if they believe they will feel positive emotion after purchasing the product rather than objectively determining Tehran the product is beneficial for them.
It's true that this technique can be considered borderline unethical.
<u>But, this is very hard to prove.</u> Which make it impossible for the government to make laws that prevent it.
For example,
You can really proof that a certain image in the ads is making people sad since different people can feel wide variety of emotion even when they're seeing the same thing.
The reason the allowance paid to Senators should be based on population is that the job of a Senator is to represent his constituent.
The function of a United States Senator is many; representing their constituents is one of them.
To represent the constituent effectively, a Senator is expected to speak with the people from his states, discussing and engaging them periodically.
This often requires meeting people in different districts in his state, holding press conferences, town hall meetings, or going to the media.
Each district is based on population, and the higher the population, the higher number of districts or communities a Senator would have to meet and engage.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that giving senators allowances based on population is justified.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3066478
A British anthropologist and primatologist, Jane Goodall is the world's leading authority on chimpanzees. Jane Goodall is famous for her work among the chimpanzees of Gombe and for her efforts to raise awareness about the plight of both wild and captive chimpanzees.
D bc the birds are mostly omvivore making them either 1 or 2 and mammals are omnivores making them either first or second gl :)
