Social grants
Advantage: This will provide other people's need into having them to be provided with assistance.
Disadvantage: Not all people are provided with the help they ask as it is only chosen by a specific organization or the government.
Free basic education
Advantage: This will help people to have education of which who couldn't afford financially and could be assisted by a specific organization or government.
Disadvantage: Sometimes it lacks or it does not provide everything of the person really needs of which he or she is still lacking such as having materials that are only limited for use.
Free health care
Advantage: Their is a specific variety of which assigned medical professionals will help other people to care for their needs.
Disadvantage: There is only a specific field of which they provide and not all of those who are sick can be tended to.
Housing
Advantage: They may be able to provide shelters to those who can't have a place to stay.
Disadvantage: They may be able to provide shelter but not enough of those components of which a person needs such as having electricity or water of which other places of specific organizations can't provide.
Answer:
Modern social change protests are a group of sexist and racist individuals who claim that they want to stop those things by showing those things to the "oppressors". For example, the black lives matter movement claims that they want to end racism, but if you actually look at the fact that they intentionally harm the lives of white people and advocate for racism against white people in schools and in society. The Modern feminist movement is now sexist against men, and have pushed for fundamentally sexist rules, even when women, legally have more rights than men in America. The "Anti-Facist" or "Antifa" is a terrorist organization who's entire purpose is to cause harm to anyone with a conservative mindset; this is actually written in their own description. These are examples of "social change" protests that are intentionally cause harm, but there are ones, such as the march for life, that don't cause harm to anyone; instead, they do a lot of good things.
Explanation:
<u>Answer:
</u>
Karl Marx argued in favor of communist ideas.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- According to Karl Marx, it was important to have an equal (not equitable) distribution of resources in order to establish an equilibrium in the distribution of the wealth among the people in society.
- He advocated that private ownership of resources should be restricted and the ownership of all the resources should given into the hands of the community.
- He believed that a specific class should not be allowed to grow at the cost of others well-being.
Explanation:
The primary distinction between quality and quantity seems to be that quality refers to a property or attribute of something, although quantity relates to its numerical worth. Quantity is not subjective, but quality is. But at the other hand, quantity refers to the extent, size, or total of something.
The correct answer is all of the above (option d)
more people would produce more waste (c) and they would also take up more space for living and by producing waste that contaminates the environment, which could leave to a decreased food production. they would also produce more pollution!<span />
